Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- From: "Rose Melinis" <rosemelinis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:18:47 GMT
So, if a person were to organize a religion, and among it's "religious
views" were approval of child abuse, or drug use, or corporal punishment,
the Philippine Supreme Court would come down on the side of "it's a free
country"? They have just replaced the constitution, laws, regulations, and
replaced them with the bible, koran, and the book of moron.
This doesn't open doors. It takes down every law, rule, regulation, etc.
nationwide.
"Stupid is as stupid does." Pigette
<boracaybill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151100159.093957.114660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snippet:
---
BY ruling in favor of a woman who was living with a man without the
benefit of marriage, the Supreme Court affirmed the exercise of
religion, and stressed that this is a free country.
<snip>
With the plurality of religions comes the plurality of actions and
views. Punishing Muslim men for having four wives, or sanctioning
conservative Mormons for continuing to practice plural marriages is
tantamount to asserting an imagined supremacy of paradigm.
---
see http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?page=editorial_june24_2006
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- From: Just JT
- Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- From: boracaybill
- Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- From: Voltes34
- Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- References:
- Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- From: boracaybill
- Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- Prev by Date: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- Next by Date: Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- Previous by thread: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- Next by thread: Re: Manila Standard Op-Ed: The Right to Faith
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|