Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: "Rajah Homaba" <rajah_homaba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Mar 2006 22:35:12 -0800
Peter Gamolo wrote:
no can do to change into a parliamentary system in one amendment
would be breaking the law in other parts of the constitution. how
do you reconcile a parliament system with other parts of the
constitution that says there is a president and a vice president
plus the sentators and copngressman ? its a pipe dream dood . give
it up your only hope is if congress changes anything with a 2 third
vote . [ which i doubt since senate says they are not budging. looks
like you are not getting your wish .
imo new elections is easier.
Ah, regional senate representation is okay as well. Most likely less
conflict to other existing laws. I don't have much problem with
bicameral presidential as long as there's equal representation in the
capital. You can still have your snap election, malacanang is still
there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Peter Gamolo
- Virtual Senate (Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court)
- From: Rajah Homaba
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- References:
- People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Rajah Homaba
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Peter Gamolo
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Peter Gamolo
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Rajah Homaba
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Peter Gamolo
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Rajah Homaba
- Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- From: Peter Gamolo
- People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- Prev by Date: Allah Came Knocking At My Heart
- Next by Date: Re: Allah Came Knocking At My Heart
- Previous by thread: Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court
- Next by thread: Virtual Senate (Re: People's Initiative And The Supreme Court)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|