For the Cardinal, the issue of prisoners is case closed

Once again, when confronted by his lies, the cowardly apologist, Paul
Lamot, can only snip and run away in terror.

Really, Paul Lamot, if this is the best you can do, and you are simply
going to keep repeating yourself word-for-word without addressing the
issues like this, do not expect a reply from me on these matters.

Again, we are left with the fact that Amnesty International and now
the Catholic Church it seems are refusing to call for release of any
more convicted criminals in Cuba. The "Ladies" are furious and have
vowed to continue their fight to free the spies and terrorists
remaining in Cuba jails "with or without the help of the Catholic
Church."


On Nov 4, 8:36 am, PL <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snipping portions of PL's abusive posting already debunked here, or
just too lame to bother with]

The ladies in white have never demanded the release of anyone involved
in violence.

The "Ladies" are demanding the release of convicted criminals that, as terrorists and spies, not even Amnesty International can support them! (snip)

people convicted under the abusive laws of the Cuban regime

[snipping more of the same]

Desperately trying to change the subject,(snip)

Desperately trying to change the subject, I see.(sip)


What the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, snipped AGAIN!

Desperately trying to change the subject, I see. Can't blame you,
really. In any case, tell it to Amnesty International. They are the
ones refusing to adopt your "political prisoners" as prisoners of
conscience. Much to your chagrin, they refuse to even call for the
release of those convicted of terrorism and espionage. Remember, from
YOUR OWN postings, Paul Lamot:

"Gerardo Ducos, a London-based Amnesty International researcher
specializing in the Caribbean, said his agency would NEVER describe
many on [Cuban di$$ident, Elizardo] Sanchez's list [of political
prisoners] as 'prisoners of conscience.'...

"Sanchez's list includes 'people brought to trial for TERRORISM,
ESPIONAGE and those who tried, or actually succeeded, in blowing up
hotels,' he added. 'We certainly would NOT call for their release or
describe them as prisoners of conscience.'"
"Number of political prisoners in Cuba still murky"
July 23, 2011
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/efd89de36703005a?hl=en

"It [the Cuban government] cleared Cuban jails of peaceful political
detainees designated by Amnesty International as 'prisoners of
conscience'...

"MOST of these lesser-known detainees [your so-called 'political
prisoners'] were arrested for politically motivated but VIOLENT CRIMES
like SABOTAGE and HIJACKING [i.e. terrorism], which disqualifies them
from consideration by Amnesty as "prisoners of conscience."
"Cuba's opposition tries to plot fresh course"
September 23, 2011
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/a7c0347cabeaa19f?hl=en

From Amnesty International itself:

"By the end of March, Cuba had released all its prisoners of
conscience."
Amnesty International, May 2011
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/POL10/008/2011/en/0e8b0507-bb5f-4dee-ac90-27ca409d4858/pol100082011en.pdf


Nope exposing your lies.
- your misquoted snippets refer to an outdated list of Elizardo Sanchez,

What the cowardly Paul Lamot also snipped and refused to address:

The list of so-called "political prisoners" you refer to here was
cited in YOUR OWN posting dated July 23, 2011. It can't be that out of
date.

not one of the ladies in white.

[snipping repetitious portion of Paul Lamot's pathetic posting]

Once again, you have snipped my reply and simply repeated yourself
word-for-word! What a loser. Here is my reply again:

Are you now saying that one of the "Ladies" has been convicted and
sentenced to a prison term, and that she was NOT adopted as a
"prisoner of conscience" by Amnesty International? This is breaking
news!!!

Who is she? What was she charged with? Was it terrorism or espionage?
Those are about the only convictions that would prevent AI from
adopting her as a prisoner of conscience.

-----------------

I can see that you would rather not answer these questions, Paul
Lamot. Can't blame you, really.

But thanks for confirming by your cowardly snipping and running that
not even a die-hard apologist like you, Paul Lamot, can deny that
Amnesty International seems to believe that a conviction for terrorism
or espionage in a Cuban court is sufficient grounds for rejecting
someone as a prisoner of conscience. This, after all, is according to
YOUR OWN posting, Paul Lamot.

No "spies and terrorists". Peaceful activists and political prisoners

Your own postings say otherwise, [abuse of my privacy by blackmailer Dan Christensen aka DCPROOF].(snip)

Nope.
It confirms what I said.

Have you forgotten already, Paul Lamot?(snip)


What the cowardly Paul Lamot also snipped:

Have you forgotten already, Paul Lamot? From YOUR OWN posting:

"Of the remaining 104 [prisoners on Sanchez's list], about half were
convicted of terrorism, hijacking or other violent crimes, and four
are former military or intelligence agents convicted of espionage or
revealing state secrets."
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/efd89de36703005a?h...

Once again, we see what a TRULY desperate liar you are, Paul Lamot.

Nope.
I have seen your post-edited crap hundreds of time and I am still
dealing with reality dismissing your desperate lies

Very evasive, Paul Lamot. But thanks for confirming by your cowardly
snipping and running that you lied when you said there are "no spies
and terrorists."

Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at its new home:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/danchristienses/CubaFAQ.html
(The original CubaFAQ website. Don't be fooled by PL's cheap
imitations.)

PS: By using my full name here, the stupid and cowardly blackmailer,
Paul Lamot, hopes to intimidate me into silence. When I recently
suggested that we stop using each others names here, Paul Lamot very
foolishly and very publicly announced his evil intentions saying, "You
stop all lies, spam and insults and there is no more [my name]."
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/d21d7996101c343c?hl=en

(Wish you could take it back now, Paul Lamot? Too bad! It will be
online for generations to come. And until you can learn some manners,
I will rub your face in it every day for as many years as it takes,
Paul Lamot.)

Paul Lamot, in his own inarticulate fashion here, was demanding that I
stop posting what are, for him, some very inconvenient truths --
everything from the genocidal natural of his beloved embargo to the
declining stock of his di$$ident pals in Cuba to the sad truth about
his pathetic little websites. Otherwise, he threatened to continue
violating my privacy by posting my full name here. Whatever other
rationalizations and flimsy pretexts he may present here, this threat
reveals his true motive -- to blackmail me into silence. As you can
see, it isn't working. Paul Lamot has only succeeded in undermining
what little personal credibility he had left here.

Paul Lamot still has over 1,000 postings online under his name here.
See:
http://groups.google.ca/groups/search?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2011&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2011&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=Paul+Lamot&safe=off

In addition, Paul Lamot once had a link at his anti-Cuban propaganda
site (in the WHOIS data) to his "management consulting" homepage. It
gave his full name, address, telephone number and CV. By his own
twisted logic then, he is not entitled to ANY privacy. You are such a
hypocrite, Paul Lamot.

Just remember, Paul Lamot, whenever you use my last name or refer to
DCP, I will respond in kind by using your name ten times over. Get
used to it. In every thread, as here, you are always the instigator,
so it is entirely up to you to put an end to this.

As an antidote to each of Paul Lamot's venomous personal attacks here,
and in anticipation of more of his trollish, endlessly repetitive, off-
topic postings attempting to muddy the waters here -- on everything
from his genocidal Final Solution to the raunchy "sex" ads at his
website -- interested readers should see:

"MORE of Paul Lamot's Lies Exposed" at
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/9a37abb7a40cba10?hl=en

"PL's same tired old lies and evasions EXPOSED" at
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/36c96cf26743ccca?hl=en

"Amnesty International slams US embargo... AGAIN!" at
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/browse_frm/thread/98fc46eed826e79b/64c519418e0ca6c6?hl=en&q=#64c519418e0ca6c6
.

Relevant Pages

  • For the Cardinal, the issue of prisoners is case closed
    ... called political prisoners are nothing more than terrorists and spies. ... "Number of political prisoners in Cuba still murky" ... your lies to be exposed like this every day, eh, Paul Lamot? ... Also in the same article (YOUR OWN posting, ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • For the Cardinal, the issue of prisoners is case closed
    ... called political prisoners are mostly terrorists and spies. ... "Number of political prisoners in Cuba still murky" ... Also in the same article (YOUR OWN posting, ... -- this, according to AI and YOUR OWN postings, Paul Lamot. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • For the Cardinal, the issue of prisoners is case closed
    ... ones refusing to adopt your "political prisoners" as prisoners of ... YOUR OWN postings, Paul Lamot: ... from consideration by Amnesty as "prisoners of conscience." ... cited in YOUR OWN posting dated July 23, ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Why are the "Ladies" so unpopular?
    ... make mention of these "political prisoners," ... make mention of these "political prisoners," Amnesty International ... your own posting, debunked E. Sanchez's list of political prisoners: ... What the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, snipped for all too obvious ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Why are the "Ladies" so unpopular?
    ... Those are just your lies. ... make mention of these "political prisoners," Amnesty International ... your own posting, debunked E. Sanchez's list of political prisoners: ... What the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, snipped for all too obvious ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)