"Ladies" trying to spring convicted spies and terrorists

On Sep 9, 11:59 pm, PL <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snipping portions of PL's abusive posting already debunked here, or
just too lame to bother with]

On 10/09/2011 5:45, CubaFAQ wrote:

Once again,(snip)

What the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, snipped for obvious reasons:

Once again, the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, has gone down in
flames here. Unable or unwilling to address the fact that Amnesty
International has not, and never will call for the release of Paul
Lamot's so-called "political prisoners" because they are nothing but
spies and terrorists, he can only snip my reply and run away in
terror.


once again I kick your [...]

Whatever get's you through the night, Paul Lamot. But we are STILL
waiting for even one report for AI calling for the release of these so-
called "political prisoners" of yours.


The recent statements by Amnesty International expose those.
They refer to them as "peaceful activists" and "courageous women" that
fight for the release of "political prisoners" whose campaign Amnesty
demands people to support with letter writing.

Very evasive, Paul Lamot. What AI actually wrote:

The "Ladies in White" and "Ladies in Support" continue to peacefully
protest for the release of others who they believe have been imprisoned
due to their dissident activities.

[snip]

"WHO THEY BELIEVE???" Certainly no call here here for the release of
these prisoners.

And here is what they wrote about their letter writing campaign:

Please write immediately in Spanish or your own language:

calling on the authorities to permit the Ladies in White and Ladies in
Support to march peacefully on Sundays and attend religious services
without unreasonable restrictions;

urging them to cease immediately the harassment and intimidation of the
Ladies in White, Ladies in Support and any other citizens who seek to
exercise peacefully their rights to freedom of expression and association..

asking them to thoroughly and independently investigate the accusations
of ill-treatment by police officers on the Ladies in White and Ladies in
Support and bring those responsible to justice respecting international
standards.

[snip]

No call here either for the release the "Ladies'" so-called "political
prisoners" who are obviously nothing more than US-backed spies and
terrorists. No wonder the "Ladies" are so unpopular with the Cuban
people. Must be frustrating as for you, Paul Lamot. No wonder, too,
that you believe that genocide is the only answer -- your own Final
Solution to the CUBAN Problem, right, Paul Lamot?

Until you can produce ANY report from AI that calls for the release of
these prisoners -- we both know you can't -- do not expect a reply
from me on this matter.

Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at its new home:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/danchristienses/CubaFAQ.html
(The original CubaFAQ website. Don't be fooled by PL's cheap
imitations.)

PS: Anticipating more of Paul Lamot's trollish, endlessly repetitive,
off-topic postings attempting to muddy the waters here -- on
everything from his genocidal Final Solution to the raunchy "sex" ads
at his website -- interested readers should see:

"MORE of Paul Lamot's Lies Exposed" at
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/9a37abb7a40cba10?hl=en

If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em, right, Paul Lamot?

As an antidote to each of PL's venomous personal attacks here, and to
his lies and evasions on everything from his lobbying exploits to the
international condemnation of his beloved embargo, see:

"PL's same tired old lies and evasions EXPOSED" at
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/36c96cf26743ccca?hl=en

"Amnesty International slams US embargo... AGAIN!" at
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/browse_frm/thread/98fc46eed826e79b/64c519418e0ca6c6?hl=en&q=#64c519418e0ca6c6

By using my full name here, the cowardly blackmailer, Paul Lamot,
hopes to intimidate me into silence. When I recently suggested that we
stop using each others names here, Paul Lamot foolishly threatened me
saying, "You stop all lies, spam and insults and there is no more [my
name]."
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/d21d7996101c343c?hl=en

Paul Lamot, in his own inarticulate fashion here, was demanding that I
stop posting what are, for him, some very inconvenient truths --
everything from the genocidal natural of his beloved embargo to the
declining stock of his di$$ident pals in Cuba to the sad truth about
his pathetic little websites. Otherwise, he threatened to continue
violating my privacy by posting my full name here. Whatever other
rationalizations and flimsy pretexts he may present here, this threat
reveals his true motive -- to blackmail me into silence. As you can
see, it isn't working. Paul Lamot has only succeeded in undermining
what little personal credibility he had left here.

You certainly have no more right to privacy than I do, Paul Lamot.
Remember, you still have over 1,000 postings online under your name,
Paul Lamot. See:
http://groups.google.ca/groups/search?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2011&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2011&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=Paul+Lamot&safe=off
) You even had a link at your anti-Cuban propaganda site (in the WHOIS
data) to your "management consulting" homepage that gave your full
name, address, phone numbers and CV (resume). By your own twisted
logic then, you are not entitled to ANY privacy! You are such a
hypocrite.

Just remember, Paul Lamot, whenever you use my last name or refer to
DCP, I will respond in kind by using your name ten times over. Get
used to it. In every thread, as here, you are always the instigator,
so it is entirely up to you to put an end to this.
.

Relevant Pages

  • "Ladies" praying for freedom of terrorists and spies -- Amnesty International and the Church
    ... Here we see Paul Lamot is full damage-control mode, ... Amnesty International has NOT called them prisoners of conscience ... Peaceful activists and political prisoners ... Remember, from YOUR OWN posting, we ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Why are the "Ladies" so unpopular?
    ... make mention of these "political prisoners," ... make mention of these "political prisoners," Amnesty International ... your own posting, debunked E. Sanchez's list of political prisoners: ... What the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, snipped for all too obvious ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: "Ladies in White" = Whitewashers of REAL repression
    ... What the cowardly Paul Lamot snipped without indicating: ... issue of so-called political prisoners as closed. ... Your own recent posting say otherwise, ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • "Ladies" trying to spring convicted spies and terrorists
    ... In their latest report on this matter, they have pointedly did NOT call for the release of these prisoners. ... these so-called "political prisoners" of yours Remember, ... posting debunking E. Sanchez's list of "political prisoners": ... As it said you YOUR OWN posting, Paul Lamot, ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Obama wants spies and terrorists back on the street
    ... The cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, is reduced to snipping and running ... What "political prisoners?" ... As it said in YOUR OWN posting last week: ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)