The "Ladies" doth protest too much?

On Sep 1, 11:55 am, PL <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/09/2011 16:38, CubaFAQ wrote:

[snip]

But both confirmed that Cardinal Jaime Ortega, Archbishop of
Havana, was absent from the meeting and said that after the
Catholic Church authorities tell you about the issues.

Perhaps the "Ladies" have become a bit of an embarrassment(snip)


What the cowardly apologist, Paul Lamot, snipped for all too obvious
reasons, and refused to address:

Perhaps the "Ladies" have become a bit of an embarrassment for the
Church hierarchy. We know that the "Ladies" have recently been caught
in some rather outrageous lies. In July, for example, they made claims
of being "brutally beaten" with iron bars and rocks, and being "shot."
After over a month now, we have not even so much as "unconfirmed
reports" of this from even one of the hundreds of foreign news
correspondents in Cuba. To their credit, not even Amnesty
International, the world's leading human rights organization, has
bought into these lies.

And just what are these "Ladies" protesting about it? They say they
want the release of people they call "political prisoners." But who
are these "political prisoners?" In March of this year, Amnesty
International declared that there are no prisoners of conscience in
Cuba. And there still aren't any. In all likelihood then, the
"Ladies'" political prisoners are nothing more than spies and
terrorists, the likes of whom Amnesty International refuses to adopt
as prisoners of conscience, and who would like nothing more than to
continue their dirty work.

The head of the church in Cuba has always stayed away from anything too
controversial.


And what could be more controversial than some professional di$$idents
with an obvious penchant for lying? Deal with it, Paul Lamot. Ever
since the international media got burned by di$$ident lies in the Juan
Soto debacle earlier this year, it seems all di$$ident claims are
being met with increasing and unprecedented skepticism. Must be
frustrating as hell for you.

See: "Cuban TV Video of Family's Testimony in Soto case" at
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/134f0d9ed8221215?hl=en

But thanks confirming that not even a die-hard apologist like you,
Paul Lamot, can deny that the international news media in Cuba, and
Amnesty International have refused to accept your lies. Or that
Amnesty International itself has refused to call for the release of
any of the "Ladies'" so-called "political prisoners" -- more like
spies and terrorists. Again, it is no wonder that the "Ladies" are so
unpopular on the island.

Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at its new home:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/danchristienses/CubaFAQ.html
(The original CubaFAQ website. Don't be fooled by PL's cheap
imitations.)

PS: Anticipating more of Paul Lamot's trollish, endlessly repetitive,
off-topic postings attempting to muddy the waters here -- on
everything from his genocidal Final Solution to the raunchy "sex" ads
at his website -- interested readers should see:

"MORE of Paul Lamot's Lies Exposed" at
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/9a37abb7a40cba10?hl=en

If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em, right, Paul Lamot?

As an antidote to each of PL's venomous personal attacks here, and to
his lies and evasions on everything from his lobbying exploits to the
international condemnation of his beloved embargo, see:

"PL's same tired old lies and evasions EXPOSED" at
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/36c96cf26743ccca?hl=en

"Amnesty International slams US embargo... AGAIN!" at
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.cuba/browse_frm/thread/98fc46eed826e79b/64c519418e0ca6c6?hl=en&q=#64c519418e0ca6c6

By using my full name here, the cowardly blackmailer, Paul Lamot,
hopes to intimidate me into silence. When I recently suggested that we
stop using each others names here, Paul Lamot foolishly threatened me
saying, "You stop all lies, spam and insults and there is no more [my
name]."
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/d21d7996101c343c?hl=en

Paul Lamot, in his own inarticulate fashion here, was demanding that I
stop posting what are, for him, some very inconvenient truths --
everything from the genocidal natural of his beloved embargo to the
declining stock of his di$$ident pals in Cuba to the sad truth about
his pathetic little websites. Otherwise, he threatened to continue
violating my privacy by posting my full name here. Whatever other
rationalizations and flimsy pretexts he may present here, this threat
reveals his true motive -- to blackmail me into silence. As you can
see, it isn't working. Paul Lamot has only succeeded in undermining
what little personal credibility he had left here.

You certainly have no more right to privacy than I do, Paul Lamot.
Remember, you still have over 1,000 postings online under your name,
Paul Lamot. See:
http://groups.google.ca/groups/search?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2011&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2011&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=Paul+Lamot&safe=off
) You even had a link at your anti-Cuban propaganda site (in the WHOIS
data) to your "management consulting" homepage that gave your full
name, address, phone numbers and CV (resume). By your own twisted
logic then, you are not entitled to ANY privacy! You are such a
hypocrite.

Just remember, Paul Lamot, whenever you use my last name or refer to
DCP, I will respond in kind by using your name ten times over. Get
used to it. In every thread, as here, you are always the instigator,
so it is entirely up to you to put an end to this.
.

Relevant Pages