On issue of genocidal trade sanctions, cowardly PL snips and runs away in terror... SIXTY-THREE TIMES NOW!!!

On Aug 21, 4:14 pm, PL <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snipping portions of PL's posting already debunked here, or just too
lame to bother with]

 >>>>>>> Multiple choice. Choose the best answer.

[ In March of this year, we have this quote from Amnesty
International:
"Amnesty International urges the US government to lift the nearly
five- decade long economic and trade embargo against Cuba as it is
detrimental to the fulfillment of the economic and social rights of
the Cuban people. It obstructs and constrains efforts by the Cuban
government to purchase essential medicines, medical equipment and
supplies, food and agricultural products."
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR25/002/2009/en/e7b1efe4-27...

1. In this statement, Amnesty International
(a) expresses support for the US embargo
(b) is neutral on the issue of the US embargo
(c) condemns the US embargo

2. It is apparent from this statement that Amnesty International
(a) would support the indefinite extension of the US embargo
(b) would support the extension of the US embargo as a temporary
measure
(c) would NOT support the extension of US embargo even as a temporary
measure

3. In general, international trade sanctions which block or limit a
nation's access to food and essential medicines are
(a) never genocide
(b) sometimes not genocide
(c) always genocide ]

(snip)


Cowardly PL snips and runs away in terror... 63 TIMES NOW!!! (Snipped
text in [ ]'s.)

Stop making a fool of yourself, Dan.

[snipping repetitious portions of PL's posting]

Thank you for you concern, but you really should be concerned about
your own reputation here, Mr. Lobbyist. I'm sure your personal
credibility has already hit rock bottom with all your cowardly
snipping and running, and desperately avoiding questions that no
decent person would have any trouble with (set snipped text above).

Once again, you have refused to say whether or not you think Amnesty
supports these cruel sanctions of yours. Again you have refused to say
whether or not they would support these cruel sanctions even as a
temporary measure. Again, for the 63rd time, you have refused to say
whether trade sanctions that deliberately block or limit access to
food and essential medicines are GENOCIDE OR NOT!

Now, be a man for once and stand up for what you REALLY believe, Mr.
Lobbyist. If you have nothing to hide, just answer these simple
questions that you have snipped and run away from in terror SIXTY-
THREE TIMES NOW!

Dan
.

Relevant Pages