Re: can you post anything Mr. Christensen?

See what I mean, Chris? If only he had the balls to write to Mr.
Stanton himself. But he would rather play these silly little girlish
games. What a loser!

Dan

On Apr 7, 9:55 am, PL <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dan Christensen wrote:
On Apr 6, 1:43 pm, chris <christiane.stock...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

Now, when shall we see some evidence of you finding those long-lost
balls of yours, Kennykins? Write to Stanton, as I did,
Mr. Christensen if you did contact Mr. Stanton and the reply is "on
the record", why don't you post it?

I did.

Note: no link.
Why: he never posted any e-mail, just his false claim.
Another lie of Dan Christensen exposed.

In response to my request for the source for GW's claim about
Cuba, he wrote back that it was Rudy Rummell. What more is there to
say?

That lie has been exposed.

If this is a substantial issue you have to just contact Mr. Stanton
and ask him for a statement you can post.

It is a substantial issue only to these two desperate clowns here.

(snip)

Nope.
I have exposed your lies, Dan.
People don't believe shit of what you say and when they ask for a proof
you just claim you did "prove" it but fail completely to post a link.
Do you think people are that dumb that the can't see through your lies.
Post the comlete e-mail with the source data Dan.

Dan Christensen's exposed lie  about Genocide Watch.

Dan falsely claimed the organization had copied (mindlessly) a number from a
book by Rummel. Another case of false claims of  "private information".
Upon verification it became clear that Rummel quoted a figure of 73,000
deaths attributable to the Castro regime. Genocide Watch showed a figure of
75,000 which comrade Dan promptly attributed to "sloppiness" in copying.

Dan Christensen fails to understand that his  private lies can't refute the
public record.
He tried this one on a couple of times and always failed.

Do you deny  Dan Christensen that you got the numbers wrong in your lie and
that the "exclusive" source you falsely claimed was used by Genocide Watch
(another "private" message)  actually gave a LOWER figure than Genocide
Watch?

I have clearly shown that your claim that Mr. Rummel is the one and only
source Genocide Watch uses is false by proving that Mr. Rummel (whose
credibility you attack without proof) gives a different figure than Genocide
Watch (73,000 versus 75,0000). Genocide Watch correctly lists Castro as a
genocidal dictator because of his responsibility for the death of thousands
of people.

When confronted with your lie you turned insult in to injury by claiming the
"made an error in copying", didn't you?

As always: the links that expose Dan Christensen's lies:

Dan's lie:http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/ff0ab4c53757...

My exposure of his lie:http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/a44230458e76...

Dan's pathetic claim Genocide Watch made a mistake:http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/8eeb4ad61f14...

PL

.

Relevant Pages