Re: Over 40 mansions form Castro's Residence

fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:24, PL wrote:

On Nov 27, 2:28 pm, f...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 04:14, PL wrote:

actually this is merely a statement of fact.
Dan is a Stalinist inspired communist even praising "workers
democracy" in Cuba and talking about the expression of genuine
grief by the Russian people when he died.
More meaningless abuse.
Nope.
Facts.
You are attacking the personality of Dan Christianson instead
of
dealing with the issues he raises.
actually not.
I have shown that his statements were false by posting even links to
images.

I'm talking about this, "Dan is a Stalinist inspired communist even
praising 'workers democracy' in Cuba" which you stated above. This is
a lie and a waste of time as well as an ad-hominum attack.

Nope.
It is a direct quote and goes to motivation of his lies.
Here is a full copy of his post:
http://groups.google.be/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/2a8bdfbc0e0f1758?d
It was originally made in a Leninist group.


It
discredits you far more than Dan.

Nope.
Dan himself has admitted that these were his words.
Unlike Dan I only post what I can quote him verbatim on without snipping or distorting.

It's an ad-hominum attack and not a
reasoned agrument on the issues.
that is Dan's specialty.

But you are doing it here in this thread, now. So it's your specialty.

Nope.
I basically state facts about Dan's motivation.

The is often a sign of a side that
has nothing to say on the issues and instead is trying to discredit
or
intimidate the other side by name calling. That is meaningless abuse
by definition.
Exactly what Dan does all the time without any basis, no?
He calls people "Nazi" "CIA", "lobbyist" all the time without having
any basis for it.

There's basis for it. He accurately identifies the tree by the fruit
which it bears. If you're going to spout CIA propaganda and fill the
newsgroup with useless posts in the manner that CIA propagandists do,
then you can expect to be identified as one of them. You and Ken
Pangborn fit the profile perfectly.

You also refer to sources as "CIA" without any basis.

See above.
actually : see allover when you don't like the facts posted.
According to you Amnesty International, HRW, ... are all CIA.
That says a lot more about you than about these organizations.

PL
.

Relevant Pages