Re: Blow-by-blow account of Brothers to the Rescue tragedy



On Aug 28, 3:57 pm, "PL" <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snipping portion of PL's posting already debunked here, or too lame
to bother with]

Scroll up, idiot! See the part about photos in the Miami Herald
clearly showing USAF markings??? That was several years BEFORE the
shootdown -- in 1993!

Three years before comrade DAn and at a point that they seem to have
acquired Airforce Surplus planes.

And several months AFTER the shootdown, according to facts disclosed
in the Security Council debate.

(snip)

each time when new planes were bought from the Army surplus it seems.

How many times? Only once as far as I know -- in 1993.


But thanks for confirming you can not prove that ANY of the planes shot down
had military colours.


Again, what we have is evidence disclosed at the Security Council
debates that BTTR planes had military markings both and after the
shootdown. As even your faithful protege has pointed out here, this is
completely illegal. And we also have expert testimony at the so-called
Miami spy trial that BTTR planes had military markings, and thus no
longer qualified as civilian aircraft. And while I don't know how he
established this -- it isn't clear from media accounts -- his widely
published testimony was never refuted by the prosecution or by any of
your political masters in the years since then. Their silence on this
matter has been absolutely deafening! It seems they have conceded the
point and hope that no one has noticed.

Anyway, it seems you, too, have once again been reduced to mindlessly
repeating your failed arguments here, desperately hoping that no one
has noticed. If you have no new and relevant information to share, do
not expect a reply from me on this matter.

See "Human Rights / The BTTR Shootdown Revisited" at my website.

Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at http://www.netcom.ca/~dchris/CubaFAQ.html

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blow-by-blow account of Brothers to the Rescue tragedy
    ... And several months AFTER the shootdown, ... BTTR planes had military markings all along. ... Let's see your proof that replacements were acquired. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: The BTR Shootdown Revisited
    ... lost their civilian status because of their markings ... time of the shootdown, the BTR planes had military markings. ... [snip more of the same] ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: The BTR Shootdown Revisited
    ... lost their civilian status because of their markings ... time of the shootdown, the BTR planes had military markings. ... [snip more of the same] ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)