Re: Blow-by-blow account of Brothers to the Rescue tragedy

On Aug 23, 1:11 pm, PL <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snipping portion of PL's posting already debunked here, or too lame
to bother with]

"Three years ago and earlier, in 1992 and 1993, in Miami, a United
States Congresswoman from Florida organized a major campaign to
petition the Pentagon to provide several Cessna 337s or O2s to the
group that participated in the incident of 24 February. She was very
explicit and active, making many statements and taking a number of
initiatives. It would seem that she was successful, because on 19 July
of that year the Miami Herald published a report on its editorial
page, written not by just any journalist but by Mr. David Lawrence,
the editor of the Herald."
does not prove that any of the planes shot down had military markings

We have evidence here that the BTTR planes had USAF markings both
before and after the shootdown.

Nope.
It doesn't.
There only element that made it "seem" that planes were provided refers
to a plane seen AFTER the incident.

Scroll up, idiot! See the part about photos in the Miami Herald
clearly showing USAF markings??? That was several years BEFORE the
shootdown -- in 1993!


NOTHING refers to the planes shot down.

It refers to BTTR planes that were found to have USAF markings in 1993
and three years later, AFTER the shootdown.


One lie exposed.


Yours, Mr. Lobbyist!


In this account, Mr. Lawrence tells us of a trip he took with the
group known as Brothers to the Rescue, the group in question. Like any
good journalist, he accompanies his account with photographs,
including some of the plane that was used. In one, the marking
"N2432S" is quite sharp; in another, four letters are clearly visible
on its wing: "USAF". In other words, this is not merely a type of
plane that is used by the military; it is not, as the Congresswoman
claimed, just that similar aircraft were to be found in airports in
Florida ever since the end of the conflict in Central America; Mr.
David Lawrence Jr. actually flew in the one bearing the marking
N2432S, from which the United States Air Force marking had not even
been erased.
the conclusion that it is a USAF plane is incorrect
Lots of old planes bought second hand by military aficionados still
carry all markings.
The fact that letters are on a planes does not mean it is fully equipped
like a military plane.

If you fly without permission into enemy territory with military
markings, there may be consequences.

"Enemy territory"? Planes go from the US to Cuba all the time.

[snip]

Only genuinely civilian aircraft without military markings, and with
permission from Cuban ACC.


The pictures and video of planes shows they
hadn't.http://www.miamiherald.com/548/story/192166.html
Link doesn't work.
View footage at Youtubehttp://youtube.com/watch?v=hR-ABOsDN9k
A trailer for your propaganda flick here -- nothing more.
(snip)
Nope.
A trailer with a reconstruction that exposes your lies.
How so? You have no documentation for any of the clips shown
(snip)

False.
it is film about the killing reconstructing what happened showing
identical planes.

You have no proof of this.

Have a look at the trailer.
That is what they say.

[snip]

So, I guess we must believe them... Get real, Mr. Lobbyist!

Again, for several years now, we have been waiting for any kind of
rebuttal or even a denial from your political masters of evidence
disclosed at the Security Council debate and at the so-called Miami
spy trials (previous postings here). Their silence on these matters
has been absolutely deafening!

Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at http://www.netcom.ca/~dchris/CubaFAQ.html

.

Relevant Pages