Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- From: "PL" <pl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:17:32 GMT
"Dan Christensen" <dchris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141240785.545796.303040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PL" <pl.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:99iNf.287267$j31.9127030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip portions of PL posting already debunked here, or too lame to
bother with]
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yep, firm as hell.[snip]Nope comrade Dan.[snip]oSScar, oSScar, oSScar....Fact 1: Dan is the Nazi and is a hypocrite in accusing others
You support a dictator that is on the list of Genocide Watch.
www.genocidewatch.org
Much to the chagrin of all you embargo-Nazis, GW recently withdrew
their particularly outrageous claims
Castro is still firmly on their list.
www.genocidewatch.org/genocidetable2005.htm
Not so "firmly" anymore,
Given the current debate over the exact number (with estimates now up to
130,000) with a consensus un the high 90,000's I guess they took a safety
margen.
[snip]
Whatever gets you through the night,
Just the facts.
A good overview is available here:
http://www.cubaverdad.net/genocide.htm
Nazi boy.
You are the only Nazi here and you are a hypocrite in accusing others
DIRECT quotes of YOUR own words:
You support human rights abuses and extra-judicial killings:
Quote:
"In my opinion the advances made by the Revolution are morally well worth
fighting for and justify the use of these extraordinary measures. In this
case, the ends do indeed justify the means.
........
These measures, however, would NOT be morally justified in propping less
worthy regimes in the region -- the USA and its vassal states in the
Caribbean and Latin America come immediately to mind."
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/30da2e6461ef2006?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8
"It is wrong to think that a particular end justifies EVERY means. At this
time, for example, it would be wrong of the Cuban government to send death
squads after their opponents as happens in Mexico and Colombia. Again, the
actions of the Cuban government in detaining these so-called dissidents seem
quite mild in comparison and are morally justified under the circumstances."
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/590f2b46693bf729?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8
Unquote.
Snipping these direct quotes doesn't change the facts comrade Dan.
There is in fact no such "consensus." It is a figment of your feverish,
False:
See the overview at: http://www.cubaverdad.net/genocide.htm
Lobbyist
Nope.
The best proof: you can't quote me. All you have is me using a verb.
Your "point" is as ridiculous as calling a man that uses the verb "drink" a
"total drunk".
But the you know that as these are no more than lies and insults to further
your cause he comrade Dan?
Still waiting for the "Geneva" proof comrade Dan.
That "episode" clearly exposes your lies.
As I said comrade Dan.
Every time you post that lie about me I post the truth about you. You can
not deny that you are a self declared Stalinist cyber activists who lives in
a nice 250,000 dollar suburban house in Canada (realtor site with images can
be given at your request) while playing the communist.
Stuck as you are without arguments all you have left are lies, personal
attacks and moronic innuendo
Remember the lie about "lobbying in Geneva" while I actually was on vacation
in Cuba (as the source IP
address of my posts in SCC at that time prove).
This was your false claim:
"Taking a little break from arm-twisting in Geneva, Mr. Lobbyist?"
Link:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/b6375f9783e47aee?q=g:thl1746703614d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8
Your inability to substantiate any of it is the best proof of your lies.
Nothing more than another example of your lies and misquotes like the ones
below:
YOUR LIE about Wayne Smith
"It is clear from Smith's article here (and his website, CIP Online)
that he does, in fact, support an immediate and unconditional lifting
of your beloved embargo."
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/3f1fe3a55c12d7d7?dmode=source&hl=en
YOUR own words:
'We should reduce tensions, not aggravate it, making it clear to the Cuban
government that we do not have hostile intentions toward them,'' Smith said
during a 40-minute speech at a conference titled Cuba and the United States:
Relations in Permanent Conflict, Causes, Effects and Solutions.
''I did not say lift the embargo without conditions,'' he said.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/cuba/12157593.htm
You can enter after a free registration.
Permanent copy in the Cubaverdad archive:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CubaVerdad/message/16823
YOUR LIE about Amnesty International.
Another example of the same lie: putting words in people's mouth.
Do you deny that in your posts you put some snippets from the report
quoted below and on your site you also falsely claim about the same
report
that:
"Today, for the first time, Amnesty International has explicitly
denounced
the US embargo on Cuba in humanitarian terms, and made clear its
support for
the immediate and unconditional lifting of these cruel sanctions"
http://members.allstream.net/~dchris/CubaFAQ215.html
Link to the "report": (the one you don't give)
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR250172003?open&of=ENG-CUB
They aren't calling for an "immediate and unconditional" end to the
trade
sanctions in that report. Aren't they?
Do you deny you snipped the words "immediate and unconditional" from
this
sentences in the report (THE ONLY PLACES WHERE THEY ARE USED):
"in 1.
"On the basis of the available information, therefore, Amnesty
International considers the 75 dissidents to be prisoners of
conscience(2) and calls for their immediate and unconditional
release."
In 8.1
"· to immediately and unconditionally release the 15 prisoners
previously named by Amnesty International as prisoners of conscience.
· to immediately and unconditionally release anyone else who is
detained or imprisoned solely for having peacefully exercised their
rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly."
and added to those snippets your own words to create this sentence on
your
lying website:
" Amnesty International has explicitly denounced
the US embargo on Cuba in humanitarian terms, and made clear its
support for
the immediate and unconditional lifting of these cruel sanctions"
that sentence:
1. isn't in the report
2. isn't supported by the tenure and the conclusions of the report
You snipped two three words used by Amnesty to condemn the Castro
regime and
abused them in a sentence to imply support for your cause: a BLATANT
LIE.
What the report actually recommends about the "embargo" is:
"Amnesty International calls on the United States government
· to immediately suspend decisions on any measures that could toughen
the embargo.
· to review its foreign and economic policy towards Cuba, with an aim
towards ending this damaging practice.
· to place enjoyment of the full range of human rights at the
forefront of its concerns in developing new policy towards Cuba."
Clearly no immediate and unconditional end is demanded as Dan claims.
The request is for not stiffening the sanctions and to review a policy
that places "enjoyment of the full range of human rights at the
forefront of its concerns".
See:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR250172003?open&of=ENG-CUB
PL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- From: Dan Christensen
- Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- References:
- Herr Trabby
- From: PL
- Yet another Nazi heard from!
- From: Dan Christensen
- Re: Yet another Nazi heard from: Dan Christensen
- From: PL
- Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- From: Dan Christensen
- Re: Yet another Nazi heard from: Dan Christensen
- From: PL
- Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- From: Dan Christensen
- Herr Trabby
- Prev by Date: Re: Yet another Nazi heard from: Dan Christensen
- Next by Date: Re: Saharawian Diplomat Thanks Cuba for Assistance
- Previous by thread: Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- Next by thread: Re: Yet another Nazi heard from!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading