Re: Cuba at the height of its Tourist Season


"krp~" <web2457k@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oWfwf.32720$uy3.16486@xxxxxxxxxxx

[snip portions of Kenny's posting already debunked here, or too lame to
bother with]

>>>> Both articles you cite refer to reports dated 2000.
>>>
>>> Nope one of them referred to the latest conference, held in COSTA
>>> RICA of all places in 2005. It dealt with the 2004 data.
>>
>> [snip AND LIE HIS ASS OFF]
>>
>> Do you enjoy being spanked, Kennykins? Bend over...
>
> Danny PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC:
>

Sadly for you, Kennykins, I am right on topic, and right on track for
exposing yet another of your whoppers!


>> From YOUR articles:
>
>> "The Challenge of Health Reform: Reaching the Poor
>> Europe and the Americas Forum on Health Sector
>> San Jose, Costa Rica
>> May 24-26, 2000
>> http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/External/lac/lac.nsf/60d24d5a675982ea852567d6006cb7ca/a477fed32ea4538d8525688500637b34?OpenDocument
>
>> "Though Costa Rica's per capita gross domestic product is less than a
>> fifth of the U.S. GDP and its per capita government expenditures, less
>> than a tenth of the comparable American figure, it nonetheless boasts a
>> public health care program ranked as being of higher quality than the
>> U.S. system in a 2000 WHO report."
>
> Yes now go to the conference report from 2005 please.
>

What conference report from 2005, Kennykins? The only data cited in this
undated report is, as the quote shows, from a "2000 WHO report." Burned
again!


>> http://www.coha.org/INTERN%20FOLDERS/Jessica/OpEds/jessica_oped_costa_rica_healthcare.htm
>
[snip]

>>Under the terms of your beloved embargo, the Cuban government couldn't
>>getcouldn't get a license for Microsoft even if they wanted to. So they
>>are forced to use unlicensed copies
>
> LAME... They could write their own, right Danny?

[snip]

Yeah, right! At least you admit that they couldn't even get licenses if they
wanted to. It makes up in a small way for all the social and economic damage
done by your beloved embargo.


>>.Cuba has no choice but to use more expensive satellite technology.
>
> Actually *** its CHEAPER hardware wise.

[snip]

Then why doesn't every internet user have a satellite link? Because it's too
expensive.


>> Quibble about technology all you want, Kennykins, but I see you STILL
>> have no evidence to support your outrageous claims here. What else is
>> new?
>
> Danny boy in the face of all the information above your claims that I
> have "NO EVIDENCE" are really a laughing matter.

I don't think readers here are so amused but your habitual lack of evidence.
Have you no shame, Kennykins?


> AGAIN you DESPERATELY attempt to CHANGE THE SUBJECT and you are losing
> your grip Danny. The ISSUE you SNIPPED yet again your LYING TRASH is the
> issue of Cuba blocking international e-mails in offices throughout Cuba.

[snip]

For which you have provided NO EVIDENCE. As usual.

Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at
http://www.netcom.ca/~dchris/CubaFAQ.html


.

Loading