Nettique Everyone Should Adopt
- From: PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:12:26 GMT
Excerpt from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2057133,00.html
Comedy of manners
This week two internet pioneers made the case for politeness on the
web. Tim Dowling got there first, but his campaign against invective
left him shocked by what he found
Saturday April 14, 2007
The Guardian
Civility enforced: O'Reilly's draft code
We celebrate the blogosphere because it embraces frank and open
conversation. But frankness does not have to mean lack of civility. We
present this Blogger Code of Conduct in hopes that it helps create a
culture that encourages both personal expression and constructive
conversation.
1. We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we
allow on our blog.
We are committed to the "Civility Enforced" standard: we will not post
unacceptable content, and we'll delete comments that contain it.
We define unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that:
· is being used to abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others
· is libelous, knowingly false, ad-hominem, or misrepresents another
person,
· infringes upon a copyright or trademark
· violates an obligation of confidentiality
· violates the privacy of others
We define and determine what is "unacceptable content" on a
case-by-case basis, and our definitions are not limited to this list.
If we delete a comment or link, we will say so and explain why. [We
reserve the right to change these standards at any time with no
notice.]
2. We won't say anything online that we wouldn't say in person.
3. We connect privately before we respond publicly.
When we encounter conflicts and misrepresentation in the blogosphere,
we make every effort to talk privately and directly to the person(s)
involved - or find an intermediary who can do so - before we publish
any posts or comments about the issue.
4. When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take
action.
When someone who is publishing comments or blog postings that are
offensive, we'll tell them so (privately, if possible - see above) and
ask them to publicly make amends.
If those published comments could be construed as a threat, and the
perpetrator doesn't withdraw them and apologise, we will cooperate
with law enforcement to protect the target of the threat.
5. We do not allow anonymous comments.
We require commenters to supply a valid email address before they can
post, though we allow commenters to identify themselves with an alias,
rather than their real name.
6. We ignore the trolls.
We prefer not to respond to nasty comments about us or our blog, as
long as they don't veer into abuse or libel. We believe that feeding
the trolls only encourages them - "Never wrestle with a pig. You both
get dirty, but the pig likes it." Ignoring public attacks is often the
best way to contain them.
or
This is an open, uncensored forum. We are not responsible for the
comments of any poster, and when discussions get heated, crude
language, insults and other "off colour" comments may be encountered.
Participate in this site at your own risk.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: China's Economic Prospects: 2006-2020.
- Next by Date: Re: China's Economic Prospects: 2006-2020.
- Previous by thread: Bush and his Surge
- Next by thread: You Asians are not human; 'Shoot refugees' letter revealed: Army says it knew of Korean War document
- Index(es):