Vote 'Yes' or 'No'?
- From: "labor" <labor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:02:37 +0800
April 25, Mizzima News
Vote 'Yes' or 'No'?
A reader sent a letter to Mizzima arguing why Burmese should vote 'No' in
the upcoming May 10 referendum on the draft constitution.
Here are the reasons he outlines:
* Amendment of the constitution is rigid, requiring 75 percent of the
legislature to propose any changes and requires all eligible voters to
support the motion in a referendum. This gives a chance to the military to
rule the country forever.
* Provides opportunity for the military to declare a state-of-emergency
anytime it wants. This gives the military enormous power to bypass all the
laws and nullifies the role of civilian government.
* Does not provide for the separation of powers.
* Military commander-in-chief has final say on decisions.
* Military is a state within the state.
* Reserves 25 percent of seats in both houses for the armed forces.
* Drafted by non-elected assembly.
* Requires the President to have a military background.
* Fails to address ethnic interests.
* Undertaken in a spirit of inequality and unfairness with respect to
participating political groups in the national convention.
* Lack of consideration and welcoming of proposals from ethnic groups who
participated in the national convention in the hope that their interests
would be heard.
* No trust in SPDC's [government's] goodwill to the country as it has a
history in power replete with dishonesty.
.
- Prev by Date: Officials vote "Yes" on behalf of civil servant. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON ????
- Next by Date: BURMANSOLDIER your language is very bad, are you having cold feet ???
- Previous by thread: Officials vote "Yes" on behalf of civil servant. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON ????
- Next by thread: Saffron Revolution renewed - Larry Jagan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|