Reasons for Dissension between France and USA

Hello
This text has been written 3 years ago, but is still of topicality
before the next elections in France.

I'd like to talk about France, it's a country I know pretty well.
Also, I think it's very important to shed some light for those
readers who don't know Europe and France well, since apparently here
in this newsgroup no one thinks about what I'm going to say, so as to
analyze the situation well, WITHOUT HATRED toward the French, and
understand why there have been such changes in foreign policy in a
country that was a strong friend of the United States. I mean to talk
about the existence of the far right in France, the country in Europe
where it is by far the strongest. The far right creates insecurity,
mistrust and worries among people in France. They threaten, insult and
denigrate other politicians, including the president of the republic,
who are all so used to it by now that they no longer even respond
(wrongly).

There is spitefulness and disgraceful drawings for example in the media
they own, against those who oppose the opinions of the French "Danube
of Thought", a demagogue who encourages lowly instincts. Victims know
that it's useless to start long and costly lawsuits, as the far right
practically never loses a case, or with only small sentences, and goes
on to repeat the offence anyway. Judges don't dare to or don't want
to punish them, perhaps they actually support them, we might wonder,
even when they pretend to be left-wing. Only 'they' confiscate the
voicing of opinions when they can and want to have the right to speak.
In those cases, it's only hatred that can be expressed in the media,
that no one seems to (dare to) silence. Such is the deleterious state
of justice and the rest.

They cry WOLF, about insecurity, but they're the wolf. They say
they're opposed to foreign, abusive invasion. But by developing the
worship of their leader, they arouse other callings from fellow
countrymen, rival, jealous big shots who want to be the leaders in this
'superman' political ideology, thereby causing divisions in
national cohesion. They say they fight 'Islamic terrorism', but by
their racist aggressions against foreign-born communities, including
Muslims (cf. recent attacks against small mosques), they give great
publicity to Muslim terrorist ideology political leaders, with
opportunities for media coverage and roles as victims. People then tend
to listen to and side with the latter, and for fear of reprisals or out
of compassion for the victims of such attacks, show sympathy and
comfort for this Islam. The far right is the BEST ALLY of ISLAMISM, by
fostering its propaganda. It's all grist to each other's mills.
They need each other to make headway.

Using, twisting and corrupting symbols, they succeeded in associating
their political and racist objectives, in people's minds, with the
symbol of a cross inside a circle, which represented the Aura around
Jesus' cross. So this has now become the symbol of total hatred
between peoples, which they leave as their signature after their
attacks. You understand this is a substitute for Nazi ideology, which
was until now only found in Hitler's swastika, and now has this
'softer-line', less shocking variation. In complete opposition to
the Christian religion. Those stupid criminal actions don't bring
about any solution of course, and they have but one consequence, that
of poisoning our daily lives.

France is the only country in the world, or in Europe at least, where
over the last thirty years or so such a strong Nazi political party has
developed and thrived, to the point of making it to the second round of
the last presidential election, which required the mass mobilization of
all other parties against it in the final vote let's not forget. Its
leaders play a different tune depending on whether they feel strong
enough to express their racist wishes and ulterior motives, and say
again and again that they're against democracy in their private
media, without being confronted with having to come out and say this to
voters. This is the work mostly of one HIGHLY INTELLIGENT MAN - which
his opponents refuse to admit, and would feel humiliated to acknowledge
as such, which goes to show how stupid they are -, undoubtedly for me
alas one of the most experienced and smartest among the French
political class, which sometimes look like a herd of donkeys next to
him. He now has a large support network both in France and abroad. To
counter him, the other French politicians have chosen to respond, when
he wants, where he wants, and every time they "bring him soup in a
chamber pot". It's sad and painful to see democrats, whom he and
his people of the far right despise, on their knees in front of this
braggart Nazi they obey, whose career was one of a political agitator
and troublemaker full of hatred for others, such as General de Gaulle
back when he was alive.

He is full of self-importance now, for he has succeeding in becoming
the central reference of Interior political issues. However, he has a
flaw. Like all proud people, he wishes to be admired like a pea*** all
over the Earth, like a providential superman, and he arouses callings
as I mentioned above, among others who envy him and wish to take his
place. He in fact has an abominable little twin brother. They were the
BEST FRIENDS of Saddam in France. They've managed to make into a
freedom of opinion that is as honorable as another the fact of showing
racist hatred, voluntarily quite visibly, toward those who are not of
French origin first and then toward others, who most often shy away
from responding. As if not being French or being of immigrant origin,
i.e. not considered by them as French, were a crime to be denounced.
This accusation that all those donkeys fear is enough to silence
opponents, even those of French stock.

Naturally only the founder is allowed to say who is French and who
isn't. And are only French in his view those who've come out of his
pants, that is no one besides himself maybe. This political party and
movement is the black star of French domestic politics. Let me add that
politics is like Astronomy regarding certain things, with similar laws.
When a star moves close to another, even one much larger than itself,
it manages to change and redirect the trajectory of the bigger one,
like it or not, away from its initial desired path. And those changing
the course of French democracy in recent decades are the French
electors, who used to vote for other extremist but less harmful parties
and now vote for this one, which has managed to even win over voters
who consider themselves as Christians... Through fear or persuasion
after all this time, they've succeeded in carrying out a
'takeover' (financial style) on part of France's clergy, to
secure the faithful's ideological and electoral support for the
'great man'.

After explaining all this, this newsgroup's readers may understand
better the changes in French foreign policy and the move away from the
American traditional Atlantic allies, which is not explained to the
public by supposed specialist, intelligent and well-informed
journalists. The culprit IS NOT America, (and the US President).

This is a humiliating fact to admit and face for the French and a
shameful reality for the French democratic political class, which feels
powerless and often embarrassingly dominated in debates, among other
reasons why, because of anti-democratic rules and practices such as
personal attacks and denigrations, which they allowed from the start.

AND we must remember where the money comes from?? It is the sinews of
war. This was discussed extensively at first, before silence fell. The
reason for the silence may be above (9th line). People talked a lot
about 'Capturing the heritage' of concrete French
cement-manufacturer 'Lambert'. It is understood that this involves
forcing into his old age a rich person who is weak or dying, at the
expense of his natural or legitimate heirs, for example.
But doesn't the end justify the means for the extreme right ? As if
that would stop this type of practice... Because those people think and
want you to believe that it is possible that previous wrongdoings do
not prevent people from wanting to do right later on, and from doing
so...

In France, like in all other countries as a rule, the far right is A
MAFIA. The neighboring country of Spain has experienced it and keeps
deep traces and marks, with never-ending scars and spirit of revenge,
still undemocratic habits and laws, INJUSTICES that keep reviving
terrorism. Having said that, let's not exaggerate. After all the
extremist votes have been cast, their progress is rather halted now,
and we can say that (for now) their influence has decreased and
they're losing ground. But sooner or later we'll need to find a
solution to this scandal that has gone on too long we think. In
particular France I hope will get rid of this cancer of society, even
using a scalpel if necessary. Those despicable people have brought only
hatred and slander as methods in combat and debates.
The only positive point is that at least the people who didn't
experience, fortunately, the dark times of Nazi occupation of France
during World War II can get an idea of what it was like then.


PS :
Lately (2 years ago in fact), the 'great man' protested with
emotion against the expulsion of a Islamiq terrorist towards Algery.
There would be for him an attack with freedom of thought of this last.
(Including in the form of blows that one gives to women)

The same text :
(in German)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.german/msg/7b5340729f9c2baf?

(in French)
http://french.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=192&highlight=


You can read my main texts here :
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=573&highlight=

Kind regards

.

Loading