Re: vkarlamov's behaviour is getting even worse


martin wrote:
Peteris Cedrin? (Peteris Cedrins) wrote:

Dmitry wrote:
vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I would never intentionally write anything to you [John Anderon]
even if my familiy were ill in Helsinki and needed immediate help.
You don't know people you are talking to. If any of my family were in
Helsinki ill I'd ask John to take care of them without any doubt.

Ya gotta luv your mother-in-law!

As much as I hate to speak up for Karlamov, hitting the wrong button is
pretty easy. There are several screens from which one can approach this
and various programs that provide an interface, and most offer a choice
between responding to the post by e-mail and answering in the group.

True, but if you check the original headers you will see that Karlamov
uses Google Groups to post, and the newsgroup destination is the
default setting. To post to John's email address, Karlamov would have
to explicitly select that option when replying.


All you have to do is accidentally press the "Reply to Author" link
instead of the "Reply" link, genius.

Get a life, pathetic Sherlock Holmes. Instead of devoting your waking
hours to inspecting other people's headers, have your own head
inspected, loser. I assure you your behaviour is highly abnormal.

You do realise that your communal gewalt about whether my sending of a
perfectly normal email to John was intentional or accidental is truly
psychotic. You all are a bunch of nut case losers, wasting your life on
creating personal crises out of nothing.

You want me to pretend that I really meant to send this private email
about visas to John, instead of posting it to Usenet? Fine. Consider
that I indented to send this email to him. Sue me for sending an email.


And why did I send this private email to John? Because I consider him
the greatest authority on life and wanted to get his valued opinion on
visas.

But if I intended to hear his response, why didn't I give him a working
return address? You figure it out. Maybe I wanted to confuse him and
drive him even crazier than he already is. (It worked, btw, judging by
his idiotic response).

And why did I not post it to Usenet as I always do? Well, you invent
the story why I didn't. Probably part of my Russian imperialist or
American Libertarian plan to re-conquer Finland by sending private
emails.

I admit it all in advance, einstein.

The more I read this thread, the more I get amazed at how such a huge
percentage of certifiable retarded nuts could have aggregated to one
newsgroup and started to dominate it.

I wonder how Peteris feels about being part of such a rich basket of
nuts.... Oh, I know the answer: because it is better to be a nut,
spending his whole life intruding on other people's private lives and
emails, than a 'Stalinist Gulag-running imperialist, bound on invading
and conquering Iraq, Iran, Venezuela and the rest of the world for the
glory of the KGB" like I am.

All this replying to you nuts is delaying my re-writing the actual post
about John's hypocrisy concerning visas, but I will get to it before
the week's end, even if he doesn't have the balls to post my original
message in its entirety. I hope I won't click "Reply to Author" this
time...

.