Re: "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- From: "«Pas de deux»" <kamouraska3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 11:49:43 -0400
"Vladimir Makarenko" <makarv02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v-udnTWW4ovqMeTZnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
«Pas de deux» wrote:
You know, VK, that sort of sarcasm you are using below is dangerous
because it can be quoted out of context. Someone could write
something somewhere saying "so and so said [xxx]" and in that
situation {out of context} it looks terrible. The worst thing about
it is that, in a sense, it's true, because the person being quoted
did really say [xxx] but the malicious quoter won't provide the
context so people draw the wrong conclusion.
Be careful.
Now you are talking like a concerned guardian angel. What happened? Or
I understood it out of context?
VM.
I don't idly sit by and watch as someone volunteers himself for
crucifixion.
Arguing points of political principle is one thing. It does mean one
has to encourage hara-kiri.
.
- References:
- "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- From: Pēteris Cedriņš (Peteris Cedrins)
- Re: "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- From: «Pas de deux»
- Re: "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- From: Vladimir Makarenko
- "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- Prev by Date: Re: Croatia in 1995: worst war crime since the Nazis. Was: No benefits for Estonia to be in EU, analyst claims
- Next by Date: Re: Croatia in 1995: worst war crime since the Nazis. Was: No benefits for Estonia to be in EU, analyst claims
- Previous by thread: Re: "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- Next by thread: Re: "Moscow is not Sodom!"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|