Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: "vello" <vellokala@xxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Mar 2006 22:16:17 -0800
Eugene Holman wrote:
In article <V6jTf.742$qX6.20411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "«Pas de deux»"
<kamouraska3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<deletions>
You miss the point. Yes, it is an intellectual exercise. Christ, as a
Slav yourself you ought to understand their desire to speak among
themselves without resorting to English.
That is why I suggest Bulgarian. It has none of the grammatical
complexities of the other Slavic languages (although its verbs can be a
pain in the neck if you really want to master every nuance), but is
lexically as Slavic as a language can be. I've never studied it formally,
but, knowing Russian, I had no difficulty understanding it or making
myself understood the first time I visited Bulgaria.
Bulgarian is contemporary commmon Slavic and Church Slavonic lexicon with
an English-type analytical grammar. A cool language spoken by a very
*simpatico* people.
Regards,
Eugene Holman
For me Bulgarian is easily readable on basis of Russian, but spoken
language is hard to understand.
.
- References:
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: vello
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: Dmitry
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: «Pas de deux»
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: Eugene Holman
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- Prev by Date: Re: Baltic scores well in multilingual Europe
- Next by Date: Re: Baltic scores well in multilingual Europe
- Previous by thread: Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- Next by thread: Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|