Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: lorad474@xxxxxx
- Date: 19 Mar 2006 13:05:18 -0800
Eugene Holman wrote:
That is why I suggest Bulgarian. It has none of the grammatical
complexities of the other Slavic languages (although its verbs can be a
pain in the neck if you really want to master every nuance), but is
lexically as Slavic as a language can be. I've never studied it formally,
but, knowing Russian, I had no difficulty understanding it or making
myself understood the first time I visited Bulgaria.
Bulgarian is contemporary commmon Slavic and Church Slavonic lexicon with
an English-type analytical grammar. A cool language spoken by a very
*simpatico* people.
That's because the area appears to have been the initial nexus of an
expansory 'slavic' (central asian) colonization. Add a couple of early
bulgar-greek missionary devotees (now cyrillic saints) and voila
'pan-slavo razuika'!
.
- References:
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: vello
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: Dmitry
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: «Pas de deux»
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- From: Eugene Holman
- Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- Prev by Date: Re: Zyuganov tells Milosevic mourners: "It was not death, it was murder"
- Next by Date: Re: Baltic scores well in multilingual Europe
- Previous by thread: Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- Next by thread: Re: Pan-Slavic Language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading