Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: lorad474@xxxxxx
- Date: 18 Dec 2005 23:44:49 -0800
Elizabete wrote:
> Martin, your point is quite valid and your logic unassailable:
> companies shouldn't hire illegal workers.
Martin wins point 1.
> For that matter, the
> families of patients facing major surgery shouldn't need to wonder
> how much money is the correct amount to put into an envelope to hand to
> a surgeon (under the table).
Woah.. Where did you pull that crap from, and how does it relate to the
point of discussion?
> I can do nothing more than wish the very
> best to those law enforcement agencies that have a mandate to enforce
> laws affecting these issues.
You could also cease to flap your jaws pointlessly.
> I happen to also have relatives among
> these people and full well realize what a difficult job they have.
Probably would be easier without colonist russians, though.
> But, as a result, I also understand that, in part, the degree of their
> zeal to enforce laws depends on the extent to which these laws make
> sense to them.
Oh, so your relatives are relativists, also? Probably socialists too,
huh?
> "The appropriate response of a construction company to a skills
> shortage is to train new employees"
>
> Of course, this is true. But, it's not happening.
Never head of 'on-the-job-training'?
Probably never worked at construction either, huh?
> An even better
> question: why is there a shortage? As far as I know, it's several
> years old. In other words, long enough for re-training to have taken
> place, at the very least for some positions.
Like - for instance - a shortage of moskow trained antii-Blatic
propgandists?
> You wrote: "training for the construction industry ought to be the
> responsibility of the building industry"
>
> Martin, please bear with me, I'm not trying to attack you.
Naw, you jus jaw-jacking.
> You're
> a long-time poster who deserves to be taken seriously.
Yes. yes, yes.. but..
> But, if you
> plan on making categorical statements about the economic policies that
> Latvia 'ought' to be following,
He didn't say anything about what Latvioa ought to be providing - but
rather what the industry ought to be providing. The grievence against
Latvia is yours. As is usual.
Take a break; do a little russkie hoppy dance for us.
> please do provide a citation to the
> legal code.
Please do the hoppy dance with a bananna balanced on your nose.
> Where in LV's legal codex is there a clause that states
> that private industry is responsible for training in the building
> industry?
Probably nowhere. But such things are assumed to be the case in a
democratic maket economy. Refer to any west of Volga encylopedia.
> For that matter, should *re*-training be the responsibility
> of the building industry?
Actually not. It ultimately is a job-seeker's responsibility. A
personal choice. But if any industry was wise, they would institute
training programs to supply needed workers.
> In light of the fact that Latvia's
> Welfare Ministry estimates that 30,000 of Latvia's work force left in
> 2004 for the 'old' EU countries, re-training is a vital issue.
Not, apparently, for the 30,000 who got jobs elsewhere without
re-training.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Pēteris Cedriņš (Peteris Cedrins)
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Elizabete
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- References:
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: vello
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Eugene Holman
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: J. Anderson
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Eugene Holman
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: J. Anderson
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: aleks . tapinsh
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: execute
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Pēteris Cedriņš (Peteris Cedrins)
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: martin
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Pēteris Cedriņš (Peteris Cedrins)
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Elizabete
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: vello
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Elizabete
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: martin
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Elizabete
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: martin
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- From: Elizabete
- Re: Minimum wage increase
- Prev by Date: Re: Minimum wage increase
- Next by Date: Re: A Glimmer Of Hope/Sanity
- Previous by thread: Re: Minimum wage increase
- Next by thread: Re: Minimum wage increase
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|