Re: Uno Hu's Litany of Lies: Latest Series
- From: "Pēteris Cedriņš (Peteris Cedrins)" <cedrins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Nov 2005 02:30:27 -0800
Eugene Holman wrote:
[snip]
> Lie #5: Uno Hu[i] claims that his "phonetically rendered and hyphenated
> usage [of Latvian/EH] is correct as given"
> (1133071394.109076.4630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
> Fact: Latvian has a standardized orthography that Uno Hu[i] does not want
> to or cannot use.
This is not just a matter of orthography but of how one forms the
participle of "klejot." No matter how he twists and turns (even if he
is thinking of another word, like "klīstošie" or even
"klaigājošie"), his word is an obvious malformation -- a bloody
abortion. This is not an issue of substituting "sh" for "š," which is
an acceptable convention when diacritics are difficult to convey
(though one wonders why our little superletiņš apparently feels no
need to acquire proper Baltic fonts). Curiously, he claims that his
"native" (Indiana) Latvian is superior to that of people who do dubious
things like read literature (note the constant disdain for "literati")
or use dictionaries -- this is an error few children could make, but
quite typical for him. Perhaps he'll claim it's his patois again? Nu,
neies krastā...
Visu labu,
/P
.
- References:
- Uno Hu's Litany of Lies: Latest Series
- From: Eugene Holman
- Uno Hu's Litany of Lies: Latest Series
- Prev by Date: Re: Oto Lacis, 1934-2005
- Next by Date: Re: E-stonia success hailed by the Guardian
- Previous by thread: Uno Hu's Litany of Lies: Latest Series
- Next by thread: Re: Uno Hu's Litany of Lies: Latest Series
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|