Iran Calls for a New Holocaust
- From: "GWhyte" <gwhyte3003@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:55 -0500
Iran Calls for a New Holocaust
By Robert Spencer
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 28, 2005
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20001
The same day that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared at a
conference in Tehran entitled "The World without Zionism" that Israel should
be destroyed, an Islamic Jihad suicide attacker murdered at least five
people in the Israeli city of Hadera. No doubt Ahmadinejad had this kind of
thing in mind when he stated that "there is no doubt that the new wave (of
attacks) in Palestine will wipe off this stigma (Israel) from the face of
the Islamic world": if he condemns attacks against civilian non-combatants,
he has kept it to himself.
Imagine if George W. Bush had announced that he intended to wipe Iraq, or
any other nation, off the map: the domestic and international outcry that
would follow would effectively end his presidency. But in the context of
Israel the world has always had a higher tolerance for such talk. The Hamas
Charter states that its goal is to "raise the banner of Allah over every
inch of Palestine," and quotes Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan Al-Banna:
"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate
it, just as it obliterated others before it." Hamas attacked Israel with 113
suicide bombers from 1993 to 2005 in pursuit of this end. Yet some Western
analysts have actually advocated Hamas' inclusion in the political process
in the Palestinian Authority, as long as the group renounces violence. Is
the obliteration of Israel more acceptable if it takes place without
violence?
And of course, Ahmadinejad wasn't saying anything new, as he himself made
plain by invoking the Ayatollah Khomeini: "As the Imam said," the President
reminded his hearers, "Israel must be wiped off the map." In 1979, not long
after the triumph of his revolution, Khomeini dedicated the last Friday of
Ramadan as an international day of jihad against Israel - making it
particularly fitting that Ahmadinejad reiterated this lust for genocide and
terror during Ramadan.
Ahmadinejad also made it clear that, like Hamas, he did not view the
Palestinian conflict with Israel as one of nationalism, but of religion:
"Anybody who recognizes Israel," he warned, "will burn in the fire of the
Islamic nation's fury, any (Islamic leader) who recognizes the Zionist
regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic
world." It is unfortunate but true that many officials and observers in the
West will be puzzled by his view that recognition of Israel would amount to
defeat for Islam; although the President has begun recently to refer to the
jihadists' goal of establishing a unified caliphate under Sharia law, the
totalitarian, supremacist, expansionist jihad ideology that Ahmadinejad and
his ilk espouse has still received scant attention given its increasingly
central role in so many world conflicts. Ahmadinejad, Hamas, and innumerable
others believe that any land - not only Israel, but Spain also - that has
once belonged to the House of Islam belongs to it forever. Non-Muslims may
live in such lands, but only as dhimmis, protected people, subject to
various forms of legal discrimination and harassment; they have no right to
govern such lands. This is why Ahmadinejad views Israel as a "stigma," and
will, like Hamas, accept nothing short of its total destruction.
But this time the reaction has been different. Instead of ignoring
Ahmadinejad's call to destroy Israel, as they have so many such calls in the
past, at least some Western leaders were swift to rebuke the Iranian
President. Said White House spokesman Scott McClellan: "The Palestinian
Authority needs to do more to end the violence and prevent terrorist attacks
from being carried out. The terrorist attacks that take place only undermine
the leadership of President Abbas and undermine his principle of one
authority, one law, one gun." Of course, even Abbas has not been unambiguous
in his opposition to suicide attacks such as the one in Hadera on Wednesday.
He attributed Israel's withdrawal from Gaza to suicide bombings: "We must
remember," he told supporters, "that our achievements are the result of the
sacrifices of the martyrs" - that is, suicide bombers. "The martyrs have
paved the road for us. The sacrifices of the martyrs, the wounded and the
detainees, made the occupation leave Gaza and evacuate the settlements. This
step will be followed by further withdrawals from the West Bank and
Jerusalem."
But Ahmadinejad may have inadvertently initiated a shift in the prevailing
winds. British Prime Minister Tony Blair was dismayed: "There has been a
long time in which I have been answering questions on Iran with everyone
saying to me: 'Tell us you are not going to do anything about Iran.' If they
carry on like this, the question people are going to be asking us is: 'When
are you going to do something about this?' You imagine a state like that,
with an attitude like that, having a nuclear weapon." He condemned the call
for Israel's destruction: "I have never come across a situation (where) the
president of a country (says) they want to wipe out -- not that they've got
a problem with, or issue with -- but want to wipe out another country. This
is unacceptable, and their attitude towards Israel, their attitude towards
terrorism, their attitude on the nuclear weapons issue isn't acceptable. If
they continue down this path, then people are going to believe that they are
a real threat to our world's security and stability. How are we going to
build a more secure world with that type of attitude? It's a disgrace."
Exactly so. And Blair was not alone. Jacques Chirac said that Ahmadinejad's
words were "completely irresponsible." Even Kofi Annan issued a statement
reminding UN members that "Israel is a long-standing member of the United
Nations with the same rights and obligations as every other member."
The Iranians, however, were unrepentant. Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr
Mottaki announced that demonstrations would be held on Friday - the last
Friday of Ramadan, which Khomeini had directed be set aside for such
activities - to show popular agreement with Ahmadinejad: "The world," he
predicted, "will see the anger of the Islamic world against this regime."
And other Muslim states declined comment, although Ahmadinejad's words were
splashed across front pages all over the Islamic world.
Ariel Sharon has issued a call of his own: expel Iran from the UN: "A
country that calls for the destruction of another people cannot be a member
of the United Nations." If Ahmadinejad and his gang are to see that the
anger of the civilized world against his criminal regime is genuine, world
leaders should heed Sharon's recommendation -- and also work quickly to
defuse Iran's nuclear program. Otherwise Iran's Thug-in-Chief will almost
certainly use those weapons to make sure that there is indeed a "world
without Zionism" - and since the jihad Israel faces is the same jihad that
threatens so much of the world today, this great "victory for the Islamic
world" will only herald even larger cataclysms to come.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Iran: Rich, armed and angry, how dangerous is it to the world?
- From: GWhyte
- Re: Iran Calls for a New Holocaust
- From: MissSouth
- Iran: Rich, armed and angry, how dangerous is it to the world?
- Prev by Date: Symposium: Leaving the Political Faith
- Next by Date: Good old boys, bad old days
- Previous by thread: Symposium: Leaving the Political Faith
- Next by thread: Re: Iran Calls for a New Holocaust
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|