Is the United States Becoming Hostile to Science?



Published on Friday, October 28, 2005 by Reuters
Is the United States Becoming Hostile to Science?
by Alan Elsner
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1028-06.htm

WASHINGTON - A bitter debate about how to teach evolution in U.S. high
schools is prompting a crisis of confidence among scientists, and some
senior academics warn that science itself is under assault.

....science and especially mathematics [are] poorly taught in most U.S.
schools, leading both to a shortage of good scientists and general
scientific ignorance.


Jon Miller, director of the center for biomedical communication,
Northwestern University
In the past month, the interim president of Cornell University and the dean
of the Stanford University School of Medicine have both spoken on this
theme, warning in dramatic terms of the long-term consequences.

"Among the most significant forces is the rising tide of anti-science
sentiment that seems to have its nucleus in Washington but which extends
throughout the nation," said Stanford's Philip Pizzo in a letter posted on
the school Web site on October 3.

Cornell acting President Hunter Rawlings, in his "state of the university"
address last week, spoke about the challenge to science represented by
"intelligent design" which holds that the theory of evolution accepted by
the vast majority of scientists is fatally flawed.

Rawlings said the dispute was widening political, social, religious and
philosophical rifts in U.S. society. "When ideological division replaces
informed exchange, dogma is the result and education suffers," he said.

Adherents of intelligent design argue that certain forms in nature are too
complex to have evolved through natural selection and must have been created
by a "designer," who could but does not have to be identified as God.

AT ODDS WITH BUSH

In the past five years, the scientific community has often seemed at odds
with the Bush administration over issues as diverse as global warming, stem
cell research and environmental protection. Prominent scientists have also
charged the administration with politicizing science by seeking to shape
data to its own needs while ignoring other research.

Evangelical and fundamentalist Christians have built a powerful position
within the Republican Party and no Republican, including Bush, can afford to
ignore their views.

This was dramatically illustrated in the case of Terri Schiavo earlier this
year, in which Republicans in Congress passed a law to keep a woman in a
persistent vegetative state alive against her husband's wishes, and Bush
himself spoke out in favor of "the culture of life."

The issue of whether intelligent design should be taught, or at least
mentioned, in high school biology classes is being played out in a
Pennsylvania court room and in numerous school districts across the country.

The school board of Dover, Pennsylvania, is being sued by parents backed by
the American Civil Liberties Union after it ordered schools to read students
a short statement in biology classes informing them that the theory of
evolution is not established fact and that gaps exist in it.

The statement mentioned intelligent design as an alternative theory and
recommended students to read a book that explained the theory further.

Brown University biologist Kenneth Miller believes the rhetoric of the
anti-evolution movement has had the effect of driving a wedge between a
large proportion of the population who follow fundamentalist Christianity
and science.

"It is alienating young people from science. It basically tells them that
the scientific community is not to be trusted and you would have to abandon
your principles of faith to become a scientist, which is not at all true,"
he said.

On the other side, conservative scholar Michael Novak of the American
Enterprise Institute, believes the only way to heal the rift between science
and religion is to allow the teaching of intelligent design.

"To have antagonism between science and religion is crazy," he said at a
forum on the issue last week.

Proponents of intelligent design deny they are anti-science and say they
themselves follow the scientific method.

AMERICANS DON'T ACCEPT EVOLUTION

Polls for many years have shown that a majority of Americans are at odds
with key scientific theory. For example, as CBS poll this month found that
51 percent of respondents believed humans were created in their present form
by God. A further 30 percent said their creation was guided by God. Only 15
percent thought humans evolved from less advanced life forms over millions
of years.

Other polls show that only around a third of American adults accept the Big
Bang theory of the origin of the universe, even though the concept is
virtually uncontested by scientists worldwide.

"When we ask people what they know about science, just under 20 percent turn
out to be scientifically literate," said Jon Miller, director of the center
for biomedical communication at Northwestern University.

He said science and especially mathematics were poorly taught in most U.S.
schools, leading both to a shortage of good scientists and general
scientific ignorance.

U.S. school students perform relatively poorly in international tests of
mathematics and science. For example, in 2003 U.S. students placed 24th in
an international test that measured the mathematical literacy of
15-year-olds, below many European and Asian countries.

Scientists bemoan the lack of qualified U.S. candidates for postgraduate and
doctoral studies at American universities and currently fill around a third
of available science and engineering slots with foreign students.

Northwestern's Miller said the insistence of a large proportion of Americans
that humans were created by God as whole beings had policy implications for
the future.

"The 21st century will be the century of biology and we are going to be
confronted with hundreds of important public policy issues that require some
understanding that all life is interconnected," he said.

© Reuters 2005


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Misleading information on how clean nuclear energy is
    ... > Why Politicized Science is Dangerous by Michael Crichton ... > American Medical Association, ... > that only eugenics could save mankind. ... > In Germany scientists quickly fell into line with the program. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: What is your opinion on global warming theory?
    ... For the American Christian right, science in general produces a number ... single-parenthood, socialism and abortion. ... scientists' warnings about global warming. ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
  • Re: What is your opinion on global warming theory?
    ... For the American Christian right, science in general produces a number ... single-parenthood, socialism and abortion. ... scientists' warnings about global warming. ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
  • Re: Proposal - a new strategy to counter anti-evolutionists
    ... > There is certainly a place for education about the philosophy of science and ... school board meetings and internet groups, ... I don't know what else you expect scientists to do. ... typically under an hour of actual debate time, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... DNA strands. ... parts of the theory of evolution) that can be presented rather easily. ...
    (talk.origins)