Re: With Cheney, rules simply don't apply

In article <103bv1t5bc7s6unostdjvsp2faf3vj55q1@xxxxxxx>, trudogg says...

..*** happens. I think the story is played out and as usual,
liberals in the press have made way too much out of it missing some of
the other more important things going on behind the scenes...like the
serious arm-twisting of moderate Republicans to return to the fold and
vote against pursuing the NSA wiretaps like the good little Germans
they are.

The story was never really about Cheney, Whittington or the shooting. It was
about the national media's fit of pique at being dissed not once, but twice by
Cheney. The giveaway is the claim of Cheney's delay in "reporting" the
accident. The accident was reported immediately to the AUTHORITIES.
Apparently, Cheney should have first called the "New York Times" and the
"Washington Post", THEN perhaps called an ambulance and the Sheriff as an
after-thought.

As far as the domestic surveilance issue goes, there are serious consideration
in play on both sides of the argument. You will not however hear them discussed
intelligently on Rush Limbaugh or Air America...


--

--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.

.