Re: Bush has no shame
- From: "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Feb 2006 17:40:15 GMT
xeno wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Michael Ejercito wrote:And what if the victims of the intended robbery resist?
Nobody has a need to rob people of their weapons.
Well, yes they do because less weapons means less people are going to
killed by firearms.
There is a difference between intimidation and possession.
Owning weapons violate no one's rights.
That depends on the context. Intimadating people with the weapons ones
owns is violating other people's rights.
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: xeno
- Re: Bush has no shame
- References:
- Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Michael Ejercito
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Michael Ejercito
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Michael Ejercito
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: xeno
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Michael Ejercito
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: xeno
- Bush has no shame
- Prev by Date: Re: Bush has no shame
- Next by Date: Re: Bush has no shame
- Previous by thread: Re: Bush has no shame
- Next by thread: Re: Bush has no shame
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|