Re: Bush has no shame
- From: "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:39:37 CST
trudogg wrote:
On 8 Feb 2006 20:20:02 GMT, "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@xxxxxxxxxxx>Some of them may need those weapons for the same reason the United
wrote:
..why do the people need them?
People's possession of .50 caliuber hunting rifles, Uzis, ak-47's,
and AR-15's violate no rights.
..that doesn't answer the question. Why do people need these weapons?
States Marine Corps needs those kinds of weapons.
In any event, their possession of the weapons do not violate
anyone's rights.
Using force to take private property without a court order
Police robbing other people of .50 caliuber hunting rifles, Uzis,
ak-47's, and AR-15's violates the owner's private property rights.
..police robbing? Or legal confiscation of illegally held firearms?
constitutes robbery. Why should police be above the law?
Does David Duke have the inherent right to forcibly take an AR-15
from a black man?
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: xeno
- Re: Bush has no shame
- References:
- Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Michael Ejercito
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: Michael Ejercito
- Re: Bush has no shame
- From: trudogg
- Bush has no shame
- Prev by Date: Re: Bush has no shame
- Next by Date: Re: Bush has no shame
- Previous by thread: Re: Bush has no shame
- Next by thread: Re: Bush has no shame
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|