Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: trudogg <trudogg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jan 2006 20:30:35 GMT
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:15:44 CST, Chris Morton <cmorton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>..I think they must have had serious performance anxieties.
>>Otherwise, why would they remove the chance of a return engagement?
>
>The truth is that both of them had plenty of engagements. Repeat business
>wasn't a consideration... even though Dahmer tried a little do-it-yourself brain
>surgery aimed at that...
...non-responsive, a life of one-night stands (as it were) does not a
lover make.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- References:
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Istlota
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: A. J. Rawls
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Istlota
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Istlota
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: trudogg
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: trudogg
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- Prev by Date: Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- Next by Date: Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- Previous by thread: Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- Next by thread: Re: Our Lapdog Congress
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|