Re: Illegal Alien Uliana Abramova Goes to College in the USA

On Nov 9, 9:49 am, bbloulou <luis.river...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Illegal Aliens Defined

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=1385222

Author: Mike Cutler
Source: The Family Security Foundation, Inc.
Date: November 7, 2007

Calling illegal aliens "undocumented workers" may seem more genteel
and compassionate, but it only serves to obfuscate a critical issue
that needs as much clarification as possible. FSM Contributing Editor
Mike Cutler cuts through the nonsense and gives you the real deal.

Illegal Aliens Defined

By Mike Cutler

illegal (adj.): not according to or authorized by law: unlawful,
illicit; also: not sanctioned by official rules (as of a game)

An interesting editorial ran in the New York Times about a week ago.
Written by Lawrence Downs, it glosses over many facts where illegal
immigration is concerned. Had Al Gore not written a book about global
warming entitled "An Inconvenient Truth," that title would serve this
debate quite well.

It is important to understand that the folks who advocate for open
borders and essentially uncontrolled immigration use two primary
tactics to further their agendas. They either resort to an Orwellian
"Newspeak," or, they accurately define a problem that presents a
significant dilemma, but then propose a solution that makes no sense
and may well exacerbate the original problem. This enables such
deceptive individuals with the opportunity to push a "solution" that
furthers their goals.

In considering the first tactic of using false language to obfuscate
an issue, I would point to former President Jimmy Carter, who began
this process where illegal immigration is concerned. He demanded that
(former) INS employees stop using the term illegal alien and replace
it with the more genteel (and clearly deceptive) term undocumented
worker. The current occupant of the White House, George W. Bush, has
offered to "legalize the immigrants," a statement that is amazing when
you consider that this is the equivalent of offering to "make water
wet." Immigrants are legal: they have green cards and they are on the
path to United States citizenship. They can bring their immediate
family members legally to the United States as immigrants in their own
right. They can take virtually any job they are qualified to do. How
much more legal would the President make them? In point of fact, he
was really saying that he wanted to make illegal aliens legal, but
apparently understood the reaction to such an offer would have been
swift, overwhelming and rancorous.

When I raise these issues in debates, my opponents often criticize the
use of the word "alien" because they claim it sounds as though aliens
came from another planet. The reality is that the term alien is as old
as the Constitution. And, the Immigration and Nationality Act, the
body of laws that govern the entry and presence of aliens in our
country, defines an alien as simply being any person who is not a
citizen or national of the United States. Period. There is no insult
to this definition.... In fact when we, as Americans, travel to other
countries, those countries refer to us as being aliens. And they have
no compunction about using the term.

The second tactic, that of providing supposed "solutions" to a
critical problem, makes no sense whatsoever. Proof of this can be seen
in statements made by Vice President *** Cheney, who said that there
are millions of undocumented workers in this country. We don't know
who they are, where they are, or what they are up to - and that's why
we need a "Guest Worker" program.

I first heard this when I was a guest on the "Lou Dobbs Tonight"
program on CNN several years ago. As I was brought out on the set to
be interviewed by Dobbs, I noticed that he appeared particularly riled
up. I asked him why he was upset and he told me about a video clip of
the Vice President. I was then shown the video along with his viewers,
and I was utterly astonished to hear Cheney make that outrageous
statement. I immediately understood Lou's outrage - indeed, I shared
it.

How would providing millions of illegal aliens with authorization to
work in our country deter future illegal immigration? In my opinion,
the Amnesty of 1986 resulted in the massive ...influx of illegal
aliens into our country. They were undoubtedly encouraged and
emboldened to violate our borders and our immigration laws with the
expectation that they would be rewarded for such illegal conduct.

More importantly, there is no way that our bureaucrats at USCIS
(United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) could possibly
determine the nationalities of millions of undocumented aliens, much
less their true identities. How would providing these individuals
official identity documents in whatever name they claimed was theirs
make us safer? The reality is, this would put us at a far greater
security risk because this is the precise tactic that terrorists and
criminals use in order to hide in plain sight. They create false
identities for themselves to make tracking their movements and
activities all but impossible for our law enforcement agencies. This
is why the 19 terrorists who so savagely attacked our nation on
September 11, 2001 used a total of 364 aliases. It enabled them to
embed themselves in our country, hiding in plain sight among us as
they prepared to carry out what would be the most devastating attack
ever launched against our nation within our borders.

The "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill" that was prepared behind
closed doors in the dead of night ... in Washington (headed up by
Senator Ted Kennedy) several months ago kept me awake at night. My
fears were articulated in a commentary I wrote that the Washington
Times published. In that commentary, I referred to that legislative
abomination as being the "Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act of
2007." And, on three separate occasions, Senator Jeff Sessions of
Alabama quoted from my commentary on the floor of the United States
Senate during the time that the bill was being debated

Unfortunately, George W. Bush and other advocates for open borders
also distort the facts. A good example of such distortion can be found
when President Bush stated repeatedly that our nation tried an
"enforcement only" approach to immigration, but that such an approach
failed because it did not provide for the illegal aliens with an
opportunity to legally work here. Fact: there are currently only about
4,000 special agents at ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) who
are dedicated to enforcing the immigration laws from within the
interior of the United States.

To put this in proper perspective, New York City has just over 8
million residents. This teeming metropolis covers some 400 square
miles, yet enjoys the lowest crime rate of any major city in the
entire United States. Why? One reason is that they have a well-trained
and equipped police department that has nearly 38,000 police officers
carrying out their duties. The United States has perhaps more than 20
million illegal aliens who are scattered across a third of the North
American continent and a law enforcement agency that has roughly one
tenth the number of agents as the NYPD has police officers.

It is also important to know that special agents at ICE should do more
than simply look for the ever-increasing number of illegal aliens (and
especially those among them who become involved in serious criminal
activities). These agents should also conduct investigations into
alien smuggling, aliens who become involved in immigration benefit
fraud (such as gaining residency based on sham marriages to United
States citizens and resident aliens), and those who furnish false and
altered identity documents. These agents should also assist other
agencies such as the FBI and DEA in task forces that target terrorist
and narcotics trafficking organizations whose members include aliens.
(I spent nearly half of my career working in conjunction with other
such agencies to identify, investigate and ultimately dismantle
narcotics trafficking organizations. In New York, when I was assigned
to the Unified Intelligence Division of the DEA, I determined that
roughly 60% of the individuals who were arrested by the DEA in NYC for
drug-related crimes were, in fact, identified as being "foreign
born.")

So the question arises: what constitutes an "enforcement only"
approach to immigration law that President Bush talked about? In
reality, this was about creating an illusion of enforcement and it was
the illusion of enforcement that failed to control illegal
immigration. Providing illegal aliens with the opportunity to acquire
lawful status in our country will do nothing to deter illegal
immigration and would, in fact, encourage still more.

Lawrence Downs presumably well understands what I have set forth
above, but he is obviously following in the well-worn path trod by
those who for one reason or another, want to erase our nation's
borders and blur the distinction between what it is to be lawfully
present and what it is to be illegally present in our country. As I
have often stated, the difference between an illegal alien and an
immigrant is the difference between a burglar and a houseguest. I
sincerely doubt that if Mr. Downes, the author of the NYT editorial,
returned home from work to find an intruder sitting on his couch
watching his television, he would jump to offer him a meal and a job.
Nor would he invite the intruder to have his family join him.

Let me make a couple of points clear. Every nation is defined by its
borders. Think back to the study of geography in high school or
college - this was about borders. Virtually every nation on the face
of this planet enforces its borders. Ironically, the Mexican
government has resorted to extreme measures where its southern border
is concerned but then criticizes the United States if we even think
about securing our border with them. Politicians in the United States
on both sides of the political aisle have been largely unwilling to
secure our borders because, to ...

read more >>

Dear Mr Luis and his company



My name is Arthur Zilberman and im the husband of the broken Lena
family. Looks like you have some time on your hands, since you been
very consistent in posting these messages.



Use the time you spend on these posts, to learn how to spell. BY
spelling this way, people (viewers) will not take your posts
seriously. SO, do something better with your life. Get a girlfriend
or get a life.



Ive been with Uliana Abramova for the past 2 years, and currently we
are living together. ALL the posts in regards to her name are nothing
BUT LIES, produced by my ex-wife or her "Caring" friends.



IM 33 years old, have a business (employing 5 people), and 2 college
degrees. Do you really thing a 22 year old girl, can mislead me and
lure me into a marriage. Everything I do, I do myself with clear mind
and conscience. I never loved my wife and was cheating on her way
before I meat Uliana. I was looking for a reason to get out of
marriage for the past 4 years, since the marriage was not a happy one
to begin with. Better yet, the only reason I got married, is because
my ex wife got pregnant.



So if you think Uliana broke the family, you are wrong. I BROKE the
family. Not a silly 22 year old girl. She was just an excuse for me to
leave. Why are u passing judgments, on someone u don't even know, or
you know only the half of the story or seen only one side of the
medal.



Don't be a coward, and if you u want to discuss this like a man, call
me 2129204833. Don't pass judgments on someone u don't know. U not a
man of god, as u claim. U cause pain and destruction. Stop your posts.


.