Re: generalizations

"David V." <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Just like when you commented on generalizations you were also
making a generalization.

I guess you are not going to justify your assertion by any direct
reference to what I wrote. That sounds like you have no arguments,
other than repetition, in support of what you are saying. I'm not
going to waste any more time on your comments.
--
Ignorantly,
Allan Adler <ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and
* comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston.

.

Relevant Pages