Re: multiple linear regression
- From: richardstartz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 06:52:49 -0700
On Thu, 15 May 2008 01:10:48 -0400, Richard Ulrich
<Rich.Ulrich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 19:05:23 -0700, richardstartz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 17:16:53 -0400, Richard Ulrich
<Rich.Ulrich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip
(Concerning another post - I don't know what they
do in economics; there are some geniuses working there, and
there also are some flat-out statistical idiots.)
This is true. Also in true in all other areas where statistics is
applied.
:)
- In economics, they can seem to achieve some
success, and even become Presidential advisors....
Plenty of predictions, but no "controlled experiments".
The Republicans started treated economics as a
subset of "spin-doctoring" with Reagan, and haven't
applied "scientific" standards to it since the 1980s.
Rich:
In fact economists do controlled experiments. It's probably the most
"fashionable" area in economics right now.
-***
.
- References:
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: JW
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: Ray Koopman
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: JW
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: Ray Koopman
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: wallisjon
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: richardstartz
- Re: multiple linear regression
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: multiple linear regression
- Prev by Date: Re: Principal Component Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Principal Component Analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: multiple linear regression
- Next by thread: Re: multiple linear regression
- Index(es):