Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- From: Ray Koopman <koopman@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 12, 10:51 am, Erkki.Komulai...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I think I found something. Like with df=1 Chi-square = N * r(phi) I
think (based on figures I calculated) that in k*2 tables Chi-square = N
* R (i.e. N * the multiple correlation you get using dummy coding in
k-categories and multiple correlating to the dicothomous variable?
Agree?
For an R x C contingency table,
Cramer's V = sqrt(chisquare/(N*min(R-1,C-1)))
= the root-mean-square canonical correlation
between the dummy-coded rows and dummy-coded columns.
If R = 2 or C = 2 then V = the multiple correlation
between a dichotomous d.v. and dummy-coded predictors.
And if R = C = 2 then V = |phi = the ordinary Pearson r|.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- From: Erkki . Komulainen
- Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- References:
- Q: dichotomous variables
- From: Erkki . Komulainen
- Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- From: Erkki . Komulainen
- Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- From: Erkki . Komulainen
- Q: dichotomous variables
- Prev by Date: Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- Next by Date: Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- Previous by thread: Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- Next by thread: Re: Q: dichotomous variables
- Index(es):