Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Richard Ulrich <Rich.Ulrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:34:50 -0400
On 10 Sep 2006 14:20:32 -0700, "Reef Fish"
<Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip, stuff]
[snip, rest]
What is Group? Richard Ulrich had argue the quackery concept of
an categorical-ordinal variable and CODE the NOMINAL groups
(such as Asian, Black, and American) as 1, 2, and 3 in the variable
called "group" and do a regression on it. That is called a BLUNDER
of the worst kind by undergraduates.
Rich Ulrich never argued that.
Reef Fish Bob recently read 4 or 5 posts that defined and described
and gave examples of ordinal categorical variables, and he never
figured it out. I guess he never figured out that there *can* be
"groups" with ranges of scores.
He implicitly called the original poster a liar.
I don't know what he figures that David W. and I were doing.
Reef Fish Bob has always been poor with definitions and
with verbal reasoning, but that thread seems to exemplify
another low point.
--
Rich Ulrich, wpilib@xxxxxxxx
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- References:
- ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: jp
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: jp
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: jp
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Bruce Weaver
- Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- From: Reef Fish
- ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- Prev by Date: Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- Next by Date: Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- Previous by thread: Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- Next by thread: Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|