Re: Linear regression vs. vectors from principal components analysis
- From: "Mitch" <maharri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Aug 2006 17:11:56 -0700
Ray Koopman wrote:
They're answering different questions, solving different problems.
The direction of my question was that I am proposing to use the methods
of PCA (the largest eigenvector of the covariance matrix) in order to
find a prediction line (which is what linear regression does), and that
this PCA constructed prediction line has some desirable features that
the regression line doesn't (symmetry of treatment of the variables).
So maybe my question can be refined to
- is that method 'not even wrong'? (with my explanation above, I
expect that it is not) They are not -totally- different problems,
right? And using the methods of one (PCA), one can attempt to solve the
same problem as the other.
- is that method bad? (the prediction is poor or poorer than linear
regression; I am supposing that the 'error' is a function of the
-shorter- eigenvector)
- is the symmetry of treatment of the variables a bad thing? In an
experiment the controlled variable is the independent one, and the
recorded data is the dependent one, a function of the independent
variable and therefore there is necessarily an asymmetry of treatment;
but outside of an experiment, when two vars are observed (one not
necessarily a function of the other), there is an inherent equal
importance of the two.
Mitch
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Linear regression vs. vectors from principal components analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Linear regression vs. vectors from principal components analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: Linear regression vs. vectors from principal components analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Linear regression vs. vectors from principal components analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|