Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- From: harriscsuiucedu@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Jul 2006 17:58:35 -0700
iandjmsmith@xxxxxxx wrote:
harriscsuiucedu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:....
I have a number of questions about these two...
- FET takes a long time to compute if n is large (in comparison to
chi-square). Are there approximation algorithms of FET directly (that
is attempts to approximate the sum of hypergeometric values)?
Just a couple of comments on computing 2-sided FET for the 2x2 case
when the entries in the table are large.
As you have hinted, the computation is just the sum of the
probabilities of the tails of the hypergeometric distribution. So you
need a function to evaluate the cdf of the hypergeometric distribution
quickly and accurately.
In http://members.aol.com/iandjmsmith/Accuracy.htm there are notes on
how to do this.
Nice. Any references for where these came from (and other
possibilities)? Abramowitz and Stegun?
Mitch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- From: iandjmsmith
- Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- References:
- Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- From: iandjmsmith
- Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- Prev by Date: Re: probability of "the worst" among a set of 10 items
- Next by Date: Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- Previous by thread: Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- Next by thread: Re: Fisher's Exact Test and Chi-square
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|