Re: Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- From: naught@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:57:37 +0000 (UTC)
John Uebersax <jsuebersax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and I assume that the agreement between two examiners will be larger
if graded variables are used instead of dichotomised.
No. There will be *more* agreement with *fewer* categories. The fewer
the
categories, the less opportunity for disagreement.
But wouldn't the *degree* of disagreement, when it exists, be more
substantial for the dichotomized case?
.
- References:
- Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- From: Roland
- Re: Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- From: John Uebersax
- Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- Prev by Date: Probability problem
- Next by Date: Re: Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- Next by thread: Re: Are graded clinical signs more reliable than dichotomized?
- Index(es):