Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: Bruce Weaver <bweaver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 08:33:27 -0400
Glucoboost wrote:
I am reviewing a piece of research in which a correlation of .6 has
been found between two variables. The scatterplot is okay. However, the
N is 12. I remember reading somewhere that an N of 50 was the minimum
required for a correlation.
Is an N of 12 just too small for a correlation?
Thanks
As one of the other respondents suggested, a correlation can be used both descriptively and inferentially. I would be more concerned about sample for the latter use. Rules of thumb about how many observations are needed are usually stated in terms of regression though. Here is a comment from Dave Howell's book (Statistical Methods for Psychology) on those rules of thumb.
www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir/notes/linreg_rule_of_thumb.txt
One of the suggested rules (Harris, 1985) is that N should exceed p by at least 50 (where p = the number of predictors). Perhaps this is what you were thinking of.
--
Bruce Weaver
bweaver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir
.
- References:
- Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: Glucoboost
- Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Prev by Date: Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Next by Date: Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Next by thread: Comparing two variation coefficients
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|