Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: "John Uebersax" <jsuebersax@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 May 2006 01:32:52 -0700
Is an N of 12 just too small for a correlation?
In answering this I think one also needs to take into consideration the
likely magnitude of the correlation coefficient. For example, if, in a
given set of data, N = 12 and r = 1.0, then the N is probably large
enough to show association.
One suggestion might be to construct, say, the 90% confidence interval
of the correlation coefficient. That will adequately convey the
uncertainty in estimation due to the small N.
--
John Uebersax PhD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: Greg Heath
- Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: Glucoboost
- Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- References:
- Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: Glucoboost
- Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- From: Anon.
- Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Prev by Date: Re: McNemar Test for genetic data
- Next by Date: Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Next by thread: Re: Minimum number of cases for a correlation?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|