Re: computing scales and reliability

make that "conventional" . The spell checker popped up with a misread of a misspell.

Art

Art Kendall wrote:

With a moderate alpha in the .7 to .8 range it is acceptable in most circumstances to treat the scale as ok.

It is congenital to treat a summative score as continuous, i.e., with ANOVA.

Art

Social Research Consultants


Paul wrote:

Hi,

If one has a number of items, say 7, measured on a 1-5 likert scale
relevant to a certain topic and finds a high reliability of say .7 or
.8, can one then compute a sum scale of those 7 items?

Then I could use the sum scale in a One Way Anova or Kruskal-Wallis to
see if there is any difference between different groups?

Is the above common statistical practice?

Paul

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Likert Scale Analysis
    ... > stated that Likert scale data is fine for ANOVA and other ... If your "3-point scale" is not considered interval, ... continuous measures (no ties). ... taking the *ranks* for the sample in hand. ...
    (sci.stat.edu)
  • Re: ANOVA on ordinal data
    ... me [concerning doing ANOVA, but not reporting means] ... Just to be more complete -- the scale is not wholly determined ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: computing scales and reliability
    ... With a moderate alpha in the .7 to .8 range it is acceptable in most circumstances to treat the scale as ok. ... It is congenital to treat a summative score as continuous, i.e., with ANOVA. ... Then I could use the sum scale in a One Way Anova or Kruskal-Wallis to ...
    (sci.stat.consult)
  • computing scales and reliability
    ... If one has a number of items, say 7, measured on a 1-5 likert scale ... relevant to a certain topic and finds a high reliability of say .7 or ... Then I could use the sum scale in a One Way Anova or Kruskal-Wallis to ...
    (sci.stat.consult)