Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Brett Magill <magillb@*nomail*.sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:41:01 GMT
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:54:56 +0000, Rob Campbell wrote:
Br
lme(outcome ~ intensity + duration + intensity *
duration,data=X, random=~duration|subject/duration )
That model doesn't work. lme hangs. I do this:
lme(mue ~ duration/level, random=~1|animal/duration))
The results are as you say below but without the main effect of
intensity and with an intensity:duration40 interaction.
Rob,
Clearly, I messed up the specification of the random part, you have
corrected it as =~1|animal/duration
I think you want the interaction of duration and intensity, using whatever
your variable names are for intensity * duration. Again, something like:
lme(mue ~ intensity * duration, random=~1|animal/duration)
Note using "intensity * duration" in your model, R should put any lower
order terms in automatically, though I specified them explicitly before.
Also, check the setup of the factor duration with levels(duration) and
make sure the ordering is correct.
Anything further, I would take to the R list, where people with much more
expertise with lme than I hang out.
Brett
.
- References:
- interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Brett Magill
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Brett Magill
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell
- interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Prev by Date: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Next by Date: moderated mediation using AMOS
- Previous by thread: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Next by thread: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|