Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:39:14 GMT
<snip>
duration500:intensity 0.008720 0.0533651 165 0.163403 0.8704
duration1000:intensity 0.006706 0.0533651 165 0.125671 0.9001
That indicates that "duration 1000" is the "most useless" in the
presence of other variables in the model.
REMOVE IT from your model, and see how the rest of them change.
Thankyou Bob, I appreciate your comments; I now understand what I'm doing a
lot better.
I've skimmed the posts and I know a small amount about these issues already
but I'm sure I should learn more:
I'm rather new to this game. Your information made me realise that I was
approaching the model building incorrectly rather than misinterpreting
coefficients. For anyone who's interested, here's my take on the situation
now.
You're right that the model was over-specified but I don't think removing
intensity1000 is possible. This is a designed experiment and in the context
of this analysis, that variable is needed to explain what subjects did at
sound durations of 1000 ms.
The model I was fitting wasn't intended to be predictive. I was coding
duration as a factor because I naively wanted to know what happened at each
duration. I suppose this is a lazy way of fitting a separate regression to
each subject at each duration. But this is hardly a parsimonious model.
Under these circumstances I suspect that the F-test is not meaningful other
than to tell me that I had too many parameters. To deal with this, I've run
the model again but with intensity as a continuous variable. This test
gives me one duration:intensity interaction which is not significant:
everything now ties together and is, I think, sensible.
p.s. I know this analysis, as posted to the Group, looks a little pointless
but it's actually part of a bigger test...
--
remove ferret to reply
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Brett Magill
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- References:
- interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Brett Magill
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Rob Campbell
- Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- From: Reef Fish
- interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Prev by Date: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Next by Date: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Previous by thread: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Next by thread: Re: interpretting F & t-vals from regression
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|