Re: Comparing proportions?
- From: "Ray Koopman" <koopman@xxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Mar 2006 10:14:10 -0800
Robert Lundqvist wrote:
Could anyone please help me find a suitable approach to the following
problem:
*I have got k persons (typically 3), all of whom are observed in m (about
5) sessions of constant length.
*In each session, the part of the session they spend working with one out
of 4 methods is observed and recorded.
The data looks like:
Teacher Session M1 M2 M3 M4
1 1 20 30 35 15
. . . . .
1 5 25 35 20 20
2 1 30 30 30 10
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
3 5 10 40 40 10
The M:s all sum up to 100%.
What I would like to do is to see if there are any significant differences
between teachers, between methods and possibly also an interaction between
the two.
The problem was posed by one of my colleagues who has studied "teacher
behaviour". At first it sounded like some ANOVA setup, but then there are
these dependent M:s. Some multinomial approach?
Any suggestions?
Robert
********************
Robert Lundqvist
Dept of mathematics
Lulea University of Technology
Sweden
http://www.ltu.se/web/pub/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=4171&a=10697
Yes, you can do an anova. See the sci.stat.consult thread
"Within-subjects proportional data", Sep 20-28, 2005:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.stat.consult/browse_frm/thread/d6b4b2c1d6180943/
.
- References:
- Comparing proportions?
- From: Robert Lundqvist
- Comparing proportions?
- Prev by Date: Re: how to input control variables in a multiple regression analysis using SPSS
- Next by Date: Resolution in time series?
- Previous by thread: Comparing proportions?
- Next by thread: Resolution in time series?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|