Re: Test for randomness?
- From: "David Jones" <dajxxx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:22:04 -0000
Stugrad98@xxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,normal
Let's say I have 4,000,000 SAT scores... assume a reasonable
expectation, as with most tests, that the population follows a
distribution (bell curve).
Now let's say someone gave you only 14 of those scores. You were
unsure of whether or not you had a random sampling of the scores.
However, you plot the scores on a normal probability plot and find
that most of the data points fit the line. Would you be safe in
assuming that you have a random sample?
No. One way in which the points supplied might be selected and still
show the above feature would be to order the 4 million scores and
extract 14 sample quantiles defined in an obvious way to give equal
coverage over 0 to 100%. Of course, you could test for this by seeing
if your line had too good a fit.
Should you feel comfortableentire
using those 14 scores to draw statistical inferences about the
population of SAT scores?Possibly, depending on what you did with them.
David Jones
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test for randomness?
- From: Stugrad98
- Re: Test for randomness?
- References:
- Test for randomness?
- From: Stugrad98
- Test for randomness?
- Prev by Date: Re: skewness, use mean or median?
- Next by Date: Extracing p-values from lrm object
- Previous by thread: Test for randomness?
- Next by thread: Re: Test for randomness?
- Index(es):