Re: Q. on Repeated Measure ANOVA
- From: "Thom" <t.s.baguley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Jan 2006 01:36:39 -0800
You could but it looks dodgy. I think you have misread the output.
If F = 6 has an observed p of .14 then I don't see how F = .639 can
have a p of .15. (Indeed F < 1 shouldn't have p as low as 0.639).
Furthermore if F = 6 is non-significant then sample size is probably
very very low. This implies the study is underpowered and you may not
be able to tell much of anything from it - noting than a
non-significant test outcome does not imply there is no effect - merely
that if one exists you did not have sufficient power to detect it.
Thom
.
- References:
- Q. on Repeated Measure ANOVA
- From: Bill
- Q. on Repeated Measure ANOVA
- Prev by Date: Linear / ridge regression with bootsrap: source code
- Next by Date: Re: Q. on Repeated Measure ANOVA
- Previous by thread: Q. on Repeated Measure ANOVA
- Next by thread: Re: Q. on Repeated Measure ANOVA
- Index(es):