Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: "Daniel" <daniel.biostatistics@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Dec 2005 06:25:44 -0800
One last thing, before I let this rest in peace! John mentions that
"SAS probably has no method to estimate factor scores when you've got
polychoric correlation". Now there is a macro produced by SAS called
'Polychor' that, according to SAS, "create[s] a matrix of tetrachoric
correlations (for binary variables) or polychoric correlations (for
ordinal variables)". Since PROC FACTOR can use either a dataset or a
correlation matrix, I could then use this procedure to output factor
scores using the matrix of polychoric and tetrachoric correlations.
Since you mention that this is usually a complex task, I'm wondering if
this solution is not too simple to be the right one. One concern I
would have would be to know what this macro produces when it computes
the correlation between an ordinal and a binary data. This latter part
may be more suitable for the SAS-L group but if this macro does what it
says it does, do you believe this is a suitable option?
Thank you,
Daniel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: John Uebersax
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: Art Kendall
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- References:
- FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: Daniel
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: John Uebersax
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: Daniel
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: Art Kendall
- Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- From: John Uebersax
- FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- Prev by Date: Connotation of the word Treatment
- Next by Date: Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- Previous by thread: Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- Next by thread: Re: FA vs. PCA and grouped vs. non-grouped
- Index(es):