Re: standardising weights in Poisson models?
- From: "Anon." <bob.ohara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:35:14 +0300
klange wrote:
Is the term "weights" just a distraction? I don't work in this field either, but from your description, you can write down the expected number of individuals that would be observed to have the injury (E_it) in age class i at time t asHi all,
I have had a colleague explain the following problem to me. I hope it's clear and that someone can offer some suggestions. If anyone has any questions then I'll do my best to find out more info and clarify.
They are looking at incidence rates of a certain kind of injury, broken down by age categories. They obviously have data on the number of injuries (#inj) and the population size (#popn) for each age group, for each of 9 years. In addition they have 'age standardised population weights' (wght). These weights account for the fact that the age distribution in the population changes over time (and I believe are based on data from the last national census).
The usual way they use this information is to calculate #inj / #popn * wght for each age-by-year combination. These weighted rates are then all summed together to give an overall incidence rate.
They now would like to use this data in a Poisson regression model so they can look at the rates over time and investigate possible trends that may be present. The question is how to incorporate the age-standardised weights into the Poisson model?
I'm afraid I don't know enough about how the weights are calculated to know what is appropriate so I'm hoping that this will sound familiar to someone who deals with this kind of data. I also may be using confusing terminology but am happy to try clarify anything if needed.
Thanks for any suggestions or references to articles where this kind of analysis has been carried out.
E_it = p_it * N_it / w_it
where N_it is the population size, w_it is the weight (I assume that N_it / w_it is an estimate of the actual population size). p_it is the probability that an individual has an injury in the time period: this is the only factor that is not observed, and is equivalent to the incidence rate. It's this that you want to model further.
In a Poisson regression, the model is linear on the log scale, so you have
log(E_it) = log(p_it) + log(N_it / w_it)
where log(N_it / w_it) is a known constant. You can simply include it in your analysis as an offset term.
HTH
Bob
-- Bob O'Hara
Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland
Telephone: +358-9-191 51479 Mobile: +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 51400 WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/ Journal of Negative Results - EEB: http://www.jnr-eeb.org
.
- References:
- standardising weights in Poisson models?
- From: klange
- standardising weights in Poisson models?
- Prev by Date: standardising weights in Poisson models?
- Next by Date: Re: Statistics Resources
- Previous by thread: standardising weights in Poisson models?
- Next by thread: a good program to make beautiful graphs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|