Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- From: "Ray Koopman" <koopman@xxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Sep 2005 16:11:28 -0700
Thom wrote:
> [...]
>
> I'd also consider a simple repeated measures ANOVA looking at the
> proportion of hits, misses and false positives. These data would be
> ipsative, but there are papers arguing that this ANOVA still produces
> sensible results in these cases.
That's the whole point of the Shaffer paper that I cited.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- From: Thom
- Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- From: Janet
- Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- References:
- Within-subjects proportional data
- From: Ely
- Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- From: Bill Howells
- Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- From: Thom
- Within-subjects proportional data
- Prev by Date: Re: Mantel Haenszel test in very unbalanced situation
- Next by Date: Re: Compare slopes
- Previous by thread: Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- Next by thread: Re: Within-subjects proportional data
- Index(es):