Re: Response Surface Analysis

Bob Wheeler wrote:
> [...] A test for "negligibility" would use the other tail of the
> F-distribution.
How would that work? I thought the requirement for concluding that
parameter is negligible was that both ends of its CI had to be close
to zero, where "close" is subjective in much the same way that the
choice of confidence level is subjective.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: best 10 women of the past 50 years
    ... I'm confused as to why you felt the need to publicly post the thought ... process that led to concluding i was right. ... SJ - Wakiki Beach ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: OT: No Popery!
    ... >> I'm not concluding anything. ... >> thing in Lewes, and don't wish to know anything more about it either. ... You could have had a bit of Skyclad there! ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Removing a pole from basement
    ... Bit of a flying-leap, concluding on conclusions, eh? ... More fun. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: OT: No Popery!
    ... > I'm not concluding anything. ... > thing in Lewes, and don't wish to know anything more about it either. ... And I was pointing out that our exchange with the Spanish has ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)