Re: Which type of variance?
- From: Richard Ulrich <Rich.Ulrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 12:32:45 -0400
On 6 Aug 2005 05:35:13 -0700, jhartdc@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Is there a simple explanation for knowing which type of variance (equal
> versus unequal) to use when doing a t-test?
The naive approach is considered wrong by experts -
XXX "Use the test of equality to tell you which to use."
Where it matters is when Ns are unequal, too (as I just
posted to the other question).
Some people have recommended
"Always use the 'unequal' test, because it is more robust."
It is True, that test is slightly more robust to the most
generic unequal variances. But it is less robust to (say)
analyzing 0/1 scores or rating scales with limited ranges,
where the pooled variance does better.
For my usual data, I'm comfortable using the pooled test.
However, in general, neither test is very robust -- when you
look at the one-tailed results, either may be grossly wrong.
If you can normalize the data by a rational transformation
(if it is counts, use square root; if it is reasonably log-normal,
use log), the better test is to test after the transformation.
- When the shapes are from the same family, then the
rank-order transformation is also effective, so you can use
the 'nonparametric' test. But generally, the unequal variances
can be a bad indicator for rank tests, too.
If you have any doubt, consider the alternate results, and
report what is going on -- if there is any difference that
requires explanation.
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which type of variance?
- From: jhartdc
- Re: Which type of variance?
- From: jhartdc
- Re: Which type of variance?
- References:
- Which type of variance?
- From: jhartdc
- Which type of variance?
- Prev by Date: Re: tails and variance
- Next by Date: Re: tails and variance
- Previous by thread: Which type of variance?
- Next by thread: Re: Which type of variance?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|