Re: Prediction in clustering
- From: "Data Matter" <fungile@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 21:18:37 -0700
Although I don't have a reference for this, my intuition tells me that
if your data is amenable to supervised classification, then those
methods will be superior to clustering forced into predictive mode.
While Art cannot be faulted for pointing to software that allows you to
do prediction using cluster output, the mere existence of such software
does not say anything about whether they should be used or not. How
does those software tackle the many challenges I have outlined?
Jay wrote:
> Data Matter wrote:
>
> ....
> > Clustering first and foremost is for exploration.
> ....
>
> I absolutely agree with you. This is the very reason why I posted this
> topic. The primary purpose of many clustering methods is analyzing data
> exploratorily, rather than predicting cluster memberships as far as I
> know.
>
> I wanted to compare two approaches (one is based on classification
> techniques and the other based on clustering techniques) for a specific
> application. For on-line application of the two approaches, the
> approach based on classification is very straightforward but the one
> based on clustering is not. (I even felt a little bit awkward in saying
> "prediction in clustering").
>
> Thank you for sharing your thought on this.
>
> Jay
.
- References:
- Prediction in clustering
- From: Jay
- Re: Prediction in clustering
- From: Data Matter
- Re: Prediction in clustering
- From: Jay
- Prediction in clustering
- Prev by Date: Re: Repeated measures ANOVA ?
- Next by Date: Re: Repeated measures ANOVA ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Prediction in clustering
- Next by thread: Re: Prediction in clustering
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading