Soyuz anomoly still an anomoly
- From: "Brian Gaff" <briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:43:01 GMT
Nobody here seemed to comment about the update to this little tale. It
seems that the bolt retrieved on orbit worked when tested so there is still
no proof of what caused those late detachments and hence the ballistic
re-entries. Of course they have moved wiring, put in more diagnostics etc in
the newer vehicles, but its still not really known what went wrong.
I guess it proves no matter how smart humans may think they are, systems and
hardware can always throw a spanner in the works by behaving in ways
unimagined.
Brian
--
Brian Gaff - briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Soyuz anomoly still an anomoly
- From: John Doe
- Re: Soyuz anomoly still an anomoly
- Prev by Date: Re: Ham radio to the station
- Next by Date: Re: Soyuz anomoly still an anomoly
- Previous by thread: Ham radio to the station
- Next by thread: Re: Soyuz anomoly still an anomoly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|